Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

310 PAKT XVI. properties stock in the new company. The decree entered August 15 adjudges — that said combination and monopoly be forever dissolved, and to the end tliat the business and assets of the International Harvester Co. be separated and divided among at least three substantially equal, separate, distinct, and independent corporations, with wholly separate owners and stockholders, and that the defendants file with the clerk within 90 days a plan for such separation and division for the consideration of this court. With the consent of the Attorney General the above paragraph of the decree was amended on October 3, 1914, to read: that said combination and monopoly be forever dissolved, and to that end the business and assets of the International Harvester Co. be divided in such manner and into such number of parts of separate and distinct ownership as may be necessary to restore competitive conditions and bring about a new situation in harmony with law. Writing the opinion of the court. Circuit Judge Smith said : ^rhe real ([uestion is whether the combination of the companies was illegal in the beginning or became so with the additions subsequently made. * * * No weight is atta(*iied therefore to the means by which the combination was formed