Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000323
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

I'AIM \V|. it' a (MHiil>iiial ioii williiii ihc piiiNicw of tin* statute was cicatcd. 11iat it was a ronihinalioii (»r li\(' ('(Hii))aiii('s is clcai*. 'I'iic fact that this (MHiihiiiation took the t'orni ol' a new corpoi-at ion is innnatci'ia I. * • * Wast his (M)inhiiiat ion ill rest i-a i lit of t ra(h' ! It substantially suppressed all coniix'tit ion l)et\veen tlie tive eompaiiies, and the resti'aint of ('()ni])otition hetwccn conihinin^ (•()ni])anies is as illc^'al as (Icstiaictioii of competition between thcni without combining. * * ^ The International by suppressing all competition betwecni the five original companies was in restraint of trade as prohibited in the tirst section of tlie Shemian law, and it tended to monopolize within the meaning of the second section of the same law, and this restraint and this monopoly were the direct and immediate eftect of the consolidation and were not incidental and uncertain in their effect. * ^ ^ We conclude that the International Harvester Co. was from the begiiming in violation of the tirst and second sections of the Sherman law, and that this condition was accentuated by the reorganization of the American Co. and by the subsequent acquisitions of competing plants, and that all the defendant subsidiary com])ani(^s became from time to time parties to the illegal combination, and the defendant companies are combined to nionopolizi* a ])art of the interstate and foreign trade.