Broadcasters’ news bulletin (June-Dec 1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

September 19, 1931 1930 CENSUS eWG^’S QUOTA SLIGHTLY The Commission on September 18 adopted the compilation of the 1930 population figures as prepared by the Census Bureau as a basis for distribution of broadcast¬ ing facilities. Up to this time, the "preliminary figures" of the Departntent of Commerce had been used as a means of computing the "quota system" under the Com¬ mission’s interpretation of the Davis Amendment. The differences in unit values showed no gain or loss greater than ,05 unit and ranged downward in values as small as .01 unit. This redistribution involved 33 states, Porto Pico and the District of Columbia, Sixteen states gained addi¬ tional quota facilities, while seventeen others lost from .01 to *04 of a unit. Kentucky lost .04 unit, while New Jersey showed a gain of .05. Indiana and Utah each gained .03 of a unit, New York losing this same amount. The remaining states showed gains or losses of ,02 unit or less. The new tabulation shows differences between the cuota units due under "pre¬ liminary figures" and the "Fifteenth Census" figures as follows: New Jersey, -f-.05; Kentucky, -.04; New York, -.03; Indiana, -^.03; Utah, -1.03; Connecticut, ^,02; Porto Rico, -.02; District of Columbia, -(-,02; New Hampshire, -.02; Ohio, ^-.02; Alabama, -.02; Louisiana, +.02; Illinois, +.02; Minnesota, -.02; Nebraska, -.02; Colorado, -.02; New Mexico, -.02; Massachusetts, -.01. Maryland, -.01; Pennsylvania, -.01; Michigan, -f-.Ol; Virginia, +.01; West Virginia, f.Ol; North Carolina, -.01; Georgia, -f.Ol; Arkansas, -.01; South Carolina -j^Ol; Missouri, -.01; Wisconsin, f.Ol; Kansas, -.01; South Dakota, +.01; North Dakota, -.01; California, +.01; Washington, -.01; Montana, +.01. The new tabulation follows: Revision of quota of radio facilities due and assigned each State, accordin<g to figures released by the Bureau of the Census of the Department of Commerce in its "Fifteenth Census of the United States 1930:" FIRST ZONE Percentage Over Of Zone Quota Present or Facilities Units Quota Under Population Due Due Assigned Quota New York 12,588,066 43.83 35.07 39.20 +4.13 Massachusetts 4,249,614 14.80 11.34 9,98 -1.86 New Jersey 4,041,334 14.07 11.26 11,53 +0.27 Maryland 1,631,526 5.68 4.55 4,10 -0.45 Connecticut 1,606,903 5.60 4.48 3.55 -0.93 Porto Rico 1,543,913 5.38 4.30 0.40 -3.90 Ma ine 797,423 2.78 2.22 2.20 -0.02 Rhode Island 687,497 2.39 1.91 1.40 -0.51 Dist. of Columbia 486,869 1.69 1.35 1.30 -0,05 New Hampshire 465,293 1 — 1 1.29 0.80 -0.49 Vermont 359,611 1.25 1.00 0.60 o • o 1 Delaware 238,380 .83 .67 0.70 + 0.03 Virgin Islands 22,012 ,08 .06 — -0.06 TOTAL 28,718,441 100.00 80.00 75.76 -4.24