Broadcasters’ news bulletin (Jan-May 1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

BROADCASTERS’ NEWS BULLETIN Reporting accurately and promptly current happenings of special interest to Broadcasting Stations in the Commercial, Regulatory, Legislative and Judicial Fields OFFICERS WALTER J. DAMM, . Milwaukee, Wis. President EDWIN M. SPENCE, Atlantic City, N. J. Vice President O. D. FISHER, . Seattle, Wash. Vice President PAUL W. MORENCy, Hartford, Conn. Treasurer Issued by THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Incorporated NATIONAL PRESS BUILDING WASHINGTON, D. C. Telephone District 9497 EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL PHILIP G. LOUCKS Managing Director EUGENE V. COGLEY Assistant to Managing Director OLIVINE FORTIER Secretary HIGH POWER ARGUMENTS HEARD April 18, 1931 The Federal Radio Commission, sitting en hanc, this week heard arg-uments in the high power cases. Beginning with Tuesday, arguments of counsel were held I) daily and the closing arguments were expected to he given Saturday morning. Counsel for each station, in turn, argued that the Commission's amendment to General Order No. 4S was unreasonable and that the first Yost report, recom¬ mending that all clear channel stations be permitted to use high power, should have been adopted. Stations recommended for 25 KW rather than 50 KW in the second Yost report argued that they were entitled to the preferred positions and pointed to the record for proof of their contentions. Before the close of the first day’s arguments rumblings of litigation were heard. Stations unsuccessful in obtaining favorable decisions from the Commis¬ sion, in the event that it sticks by its present order restricting 50 KW to 20 channels, were emphatic in their statements that appeals to the courts would be taken. Except for applicants themselves and respondents, no other groups were heard up to the close of Friday's hearings. It was expected that a representative of the National Advisory Committee on Education in Radio would be given an oppor¬ tunity to be heard at the close of the arguments and that a group of broadcasters who are opposed to high power would also ask for an opportunity to present their views. Counsel for the Commission will close the arguments, Exeeulive Committee: William S. Hedges, Chicago, III., Chairman; Henry A. Bellows, Minneapolis, Minn., and Frank M. Russell, Washington, D. C. Direefors: William S. Hedges, Chicago, III.; H. K. Carpenter, Raleigh, N. C., George F. McClelland, New York, N. Y.; Dr. Frank W. Elliott, Davenport, la.; A. J. McCosker, Newark, N. J.; Edgar L. Bill, Chicago, III.; A. B. Church, Kansas City, Mo.,J. G. Cummings, San Antonio, Tex.; Don Lee, Los Angeles, Cal., E. .o. O'Fallon, Denver, Colo.; C. R. Clements, Nashville, Tenn.; Henry A. Bellows, Minneapolis, Minn.; John J. Storey, Worcester, Mass.; E. B. Craney, Butte, Mont.; and Leo Fitzpatrick, Detroit, Mick.