Broadcasters’ news bulletin (Jan-June 1932)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

#3 LAPOUNT DISCUSSES PROBLEMS (Continued) May 28, 1932 and 300 kilocycles than on the frequencies in the hroadcasting hand, 550 to 1500 kilocycles. Possibly, in sone parts of this country, those frequencies would he of little or no value in the summer. But perhaps, in certain of the northern re£;ions of this continent, those frequencies could ho used to advantage through¬ out the year. "Unfortunately, at the loresent tine, little data have been available concern¬ ing the relative value of long and medium waves for broadcasting on the Uorth American continent. "I am very glad to inform you that such a study has just been instituted. At a meeting called by the Federal Radio Commission on May 11 in Washington to con¬ sider the proposals of other nations concerning the allocation of frequencies, a committee headed by the Chief Engineer of the Federal Radio Commission, was appointed to collect such deAa and if possible, malce a recommendation ooncerning the use of long v/aves for broadcasting on the Eorth American continent. The re¬ sults of tiie str.dy to be made by this committee v;ill be of importance to the bror.dcasting industry in this country, and, as a matter of fact, may e.ffect the whole future of radio in America.» " WCFL UETS FIVE EW STAI'IOII The Chicago Federation of Labor was granted a construction permit to increase the power of Station YiFCFL, Chicago, from 1500 watts to 5000 watts and to operate unlimited tine experimentally on 970 kc. This channel is a cleared channel assigned to the Fifth Zone on which Station KJR, Seattle, Washington, operates. Station WCFL has been fighting for several years for increased facilities and during the present session of Congress Senator Hatfield, West Virginia, introduced a bill under which labor, \7ould be granted a clear channel. A subcommittee of the Senate Interstate Commerce Committee held hearings on the measure and the IIAB appeared and opposed the measure in princiiDle without disputing the right of labor to increased facilities. It is understood that the application granted experimentally this week meets with general approval of Congressional leaders and will not be opposed by the National Broadcasting Company. OPERATOR ItEGULATIONS CHi\NGHD A number of changes in the regulations covering the issuance of radio operator licenses are to become effective July 1, according to Director W. D. Terrell of the Commerce Department's Radio Division. The changes v/ere considered necessary to meet nev; developments. Tlio Aeronautics, Broadcast and Radiophone classes will be discontinued, and in their place will be Radiotelephone first, second and third class licenseso Tlie holder of a first class radiotelephone license may operate any of the three class stations; the holder of a second class license may operate any of the three except Broa,dcast stations, and third class operators may operate apparatus of a fixed frequency type such as formerly v/as considered in the aeronautics class.