Broadcasters’ news bulletin (Jan-June 1932)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

June 4, 1932 RlviA BOARD THANKS NAB The following communication has been received from Bond Geddes, executive vice president of the RI.IA: "The officers and directors of the RIJIA, by formal resolution, have asked me to express through you to the officers and directors of the NAB their sincere pleasure and satisfaction over your cordial action in meeting at Chicago during our annual convention period and Joining v/ith us in our program. Please convey to your officers and directors our sincere belief that our riiutual interests have been furthered and our hope for future closer cooperation between our organiza¬ tions . " NE’7 ADMTISING CODE The Executive Boards of the Association of National Advertisers and the American Association of Advertising Agencies have adopted a code governing ad¬ vertising copy practices which was made public on May 2b. The code lists the following practices as unfair: "In order that advertisers, publishers, and agencies may have a code of standards for their guidance, the following statement of practices that are un¬ fair to the public and tend to discredit advertising, has been formulated and approved by both associations: "1. False statements or misleading exaggerations. "2. Indirect misrepresentation of a product, or service, through distortion of details, either editorially or pictorially. "3. Statements or suggestions offensive to public decency. "4. Statements which tend to undermine an industry by attributing to its products, generally, faults and weaknesses true only of a few. Price claims that are misleading. "6. Pseudo-scientific advertising, including claims insufficiently sup¬ ported by accepted authority, or that distort the true meaning or application of a statement made by professional or scientific auth¬ ority. "7. Testimonials which do not reflect the real choice of a competent witness . " While the Better Business Bureau is recognized as a kind of "lower court" with respect to abuses of provisions of the code, a committee of fifteen from the interested industries is set up as a kind of "appeal court."