Broadcasting (Oct - Dec 1950)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

EXTORTION IS an ugly word. But it was used by a Presidential Fact-Finding Board in refusing to grant the demands of four railroad Brotherhoods. Repeated resort to strikes and threats of strikes in place of procedures set up by the Railway Labor Act, brought stinging rebuke to leaders of unions who are attempting to constitute themselves claimant, judge, and jury. A SPADE HAS FINALLY BEEN CALLED A SPADE. In three major instances in scarcely more than a year, leaders of raihoad unions have called strikes to enforce their own interpretation of existing agreements. Their object is to force the railroads to pay claims totahng millions of dollars for work not done, for work already paid for, and work not needed to be done at all. Strikes versus Orderly Process of Low The Railway Labor Act was intended to prevent railroad strikes. It had the support of both labor and management. In addition to providing peaceful means for reaching agreements on wages and working conditions, the Act provides orderly means for settling disputes that arise over the meaning or interpretation of such agreements. There are five ways imder the Railway Labor Act to obtain final and impartial decisions on disputes over the meaning of contracts. These are the National Railroad Adjustment Board, created by the Railway Labor Act for this specific purpose; a system adjustment board; arbitration; a referee; and the courts. "Black Jacking"-Union Style! In the most recent case, involving the New York Central Railroad Company, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, the Order of Railway Conductors and the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, the vmion leaders ignored all five methods provided by law for disposing of such disputes. When the New York Central stood its ground against the union leaders who demanded that they be the sole imipires of their own disputes over the meaning of their contracts, they threatened to strike. Thereupon President Truman appointed an Emergency Board. This Board consisted of Frank M. Swacker, attorney. New York City; Paul G. Jasper, Chief Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court; and Wayne Quinlan, attorney, Oklahoma City. **Extortlon/' Says Presidential Board In its report to President Truman, this Board said: "The growing practice of creating an emergency in order to bring about the appointment of an Emergency Board in the hope that it will make more favorable recommendations concerning contentions about grievances, with no binding effect if the reverse recommendation shoiild be made, has been rovmdly condemned by several emergency boards and commented on by the National Mediation Board in its annual report. "In the instance case it has reached a flagrant Page 20 • October 9, 1950 BROADCASTING • Telecasting