Broadcasting Telecasting (Oct-Dec 1963)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

A giant step toward control Editor: A member of the American Bar Association who "performs" in an unethical manner will have disbarment proceedings started against him, and, more than likely, he will no longer be a practicing lawyer. This is not a condemnation of the practice, rather it is a comment on the lack of such force in the National Association of Broadcasters. For years the NAB has had a radio code committee and a TV code committee. As with the lawyers in the ABA, broadcasters are regulating broadcasters. Only problem is, where is the regulation? A station may belong to the NAB but it does not have to subscribe to the code. Thus a station may gain the benefits of belonging to this professional organization but it does not have to follow its "Canons of Ethics." What kind of organization is this? Even the simplest neighborhood kids' club has rules and if you don't follow them you get kicked out. In the NAB . . . they just shrug their shoulders and go blissfully on their way reworking a code that doesn't have to be adhered to. Unfortunately, this haphazard way of viewing their own codes has resulted in the "vast wasteland" of Newton Minow and now, what's even worse, E. William Henry's proposal to adopt and adapt these same codes into FCC regulations. What can be done? It may be too late, but perhaps some immediate action by the NAB and its legal staff can forestall any action of this type. The action to be suggested might result in the NAB being called a bunch of "finks" but they should be big enough to stand up to this if it results in the FCC going back to what it was created for: the regulation of channels, frequencies, powers, etc. The NAB can act as an arm of the FCC through the "public interest, necessity and convenience" clause of the Communications Act. The NAB's legal staff can bring stations who do not comply with the codes to the attention of the FCC. The charges would be "failure to comply with the public interest, necessity and convenience clause." Such charges would be filed as a complaint against the station by the NAB. Sound drastic? Possibly it is. But it may mean the difference between selfregulation and complete governmental regulation. If the FCC's plan goes into effect, it will be the first "giant step" toward complete program control. — Donald W. Hansen, director of radio kmux(fm). University of Wichita. Permission for 'Hornet' Editor: 1 have noticed that an article stating that The Green Hornet will be handled by Charles Michelson Inc. says that he had received permission frorr the Trendle Campbell Broadcasting Co., owner of the series (Broadcasting, Oct. 28). This is not correct. The Greer Hornet is owned by The Green Hornei Inc., and this is an entirely separate organization in which H. Allen Campbell and I are financially interested, along with Raymond J. Meurer. — George W. Trendle, president, The Green Hornet Inc., Detroit. Right man, wrong job Editor: your story concerning joh> griffin joining wtar norfolk, va. news staff, mistakenly identifiei him as news director of ksla-ta shreveport, la. (broadcasting, oct 21). lest anyone think don owen our news director of 10 years ani one of america's highest rate! newsmen, has departed, please cred it mr. griffin with having beei^ news director of ktal-tv texarkana tex. — Winston B. Linam, vice presi dent and general manager, KSLA-T\ Shreveport, La. (A news release on Mr. Griffin was ir error.) ANOTHER FILMLINE FIRST! The REVOLUTIONARY R-36 DEVELOPS 16MM FILM AT 2160 FT. PER HR. NEGATIVE FILM AT 3000 FT. PER HR. POSITIVE FILM AT 3600 FT. PER HR. Super Speed — Super Quality. The R-36 is the answer to the film industry's exacting: requirements for increased speed and quality in reversal processing. It is ideal for military, industrial and commercial use. The Filinline R-36 gives you performance that never existed before. You must see it in action . . . see its results to believe it. Write or phone today. • EXCLUSIVE OVERDRIVE TRANSPORT SYSTEM eliminates film breakage, automatically compensates for elongation— tank footage stays constant. • OPERATES at 83°F at better than 60 ft. per min. • EASY TO OPERATE... needs no attention. • COMPLETE DAYLIGHT OPERATION on all emulsions — no darkroom necessary. • FEED IN AND DRY BOX ELEVATOR, plus 1200' magazine permits continuous processing. • TEMPERATURE CONTROL SYSTEM controls heating and cooling of all chemical solutions. • VARIABLE SPEED DRIVE, development times from lVz to 15 minutes. K-87 Recent Filmline Installations: • N. A. S. A. Huntsville, Ala. • Reeves Sound, N. Y. C. • Thiokol Chemical Co. • WHYN-TV, KNDO-TV, WFMY-TV • Moral Rearmament Milford, Connecticut Dept. BY-64 f MODEL R-36 REVERSAL FILM • Forced Warm Air Dry Box • Filtered Air Supply • 316 Stainless Steel Construction • Film Speed tachometer • Two developer pumps • Built in air compressor • Bottom drain valves and drain trough • Rotary Oilless air compressor • Dry box and solution thermometers • Plumbed for continuous replenishment • Weight: Approx. 1150 lbs. • Size: 9'4", x 33". 55'/2" • Only $7950.00 F.O.B. Milford, Conn. WHEN YOV BUY QUALITY FILMLINE COSTS LESS 28 (OPEN MIKE) BROADCASTING, November 11, 1963