Camera - April 14, 1923 to February 16, 1924 (April 1923-February 1924)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

■f ruary 16, 1924 OT)C film tribune ?xgr 11 The Spirit of Fair Play jarently are meeting with the same good-will that they re accorded heretofore. n a recent article in his "Something to Think About'' jartment Bruno Lessing, eminent Hearst feature writer, nted out that many of the accepted artists and liuses of the world's history had been addicted to bad >its of some kind. One famous poet was a drug fiend, ., etc. Physical and moral frailty in every instance s associated with mental strength. It is but indicative the freakish trend of some of Life's order of things. Taking into consideration the number of people eniped in film labors and the relatively greater emotional sain imposed upon the players as compared with the glitude and hermit-like existence of those geniuses of 1 gone days the moral trend has been for betterment. I In other words, it is my contention the motion picture Ipple are established on a much higher plane than some II those great figures of music, art and literature who have won premier positions in history and who are often pointed out by the ardent exponents of narrow-minded reform as worthy examples for the present day artists of the cinema to emulate. It is quite possible that the kiddies of the world can still laugh at the antics of that avoirdupois actor Roscoe Arbuckle and giggle at the mimicry of Mabel Normand. It is equally possible that the young ladies of the world can still get a thrill out of the shadow stage wooing of Gaston Glass. For it is not them that they are interested in so much as the characters they portray on the screen. And maybe after all they're not so bad themselves. Maybe they're just human beings like the rest of us, just unfortunate fellow-creatures who have been victimized by intolerant bigots. One thing I'm sure of, however. If they ever make a picture about reform I'd suggest some kind of fairy tale, with Bob Shuler as the big goblin. For as a modern leading man he'd be the bunk. I'm afraid I'd fall asleep. They are coming by the scores! Have you sent YOUR Shuler Letter Yet?