Start Over

Canadian Moving Picture Digest (Mar 13, 1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

_Fievase cneck yor~ tu and Return tof RAY Lewis EDITOR AND PUBLISHER FILM BLDG. 277 Victoria St. TORONTO THIRTY-THIRD YEAR OF TORONTO, CANADA THE Ndtional FilmBeard is a Canadian Govern ‘Born and supported baby. Why should this baby continually be subjected to public spankings? Looking over its record of production and service, prior to the War, and during the War years, we have every reason to believe that it has produced excellent short subjects and that it has served Canada well. It is our opinion that its “Canada Carries On” series is first class. It has had excellent distribution in Canada, through Columbia Pictures; and exhibitors in Canada have paid as much, even more, for this series, than they have paid for short subjects, equally as good, but which have been produced in Hollywood. It might be a good idea for the Members of Parliament, who, on various occasions, make the National Film Board the subject of Parliamentary debate, to investigate other efforts, of a similar kind, which we have had in Canada, and which were sponsored and supported by Provincial Governments. Years ago, we had, under the jurisdiction of a Farmer Government, in Canada, a series of Short Subjects produced in Ontario, headquarters in Toronto and at Trenton, for such production. A research of facts and figures would make the present National Film Board baby an angelic and economical child by comparison. We are all interested, as Canadians, in having Canada on the screen, not only for the good of the people of Canada, but in the public interest. Thousands of Canadians do not know what they should know about Canada, how we live, what we do, what we produce, what we have in natural resources, what we import, what we export. Many of us know very’ little about any province, but the one in which we live. Thousands of new arrivals, and future citizens, can learn more a ____—______ NATIONAL FILM BOARD LIBRARY CANADIAN MOVING PICTURE PUBLICATION 1915-48 oam quickly about Canada, through the than through any other form of info We must admit, that j | x, publicize the greatréss, the growth’ i\entialities of our country. Anyone, who has travelled across the United States, or in Europe, prior to the War years, will tell you that what the world knew about Canada was “null and void”, and this goes for England, also. In England, it was not unusual to have what we would consider a quite enlightened person, tell a visiting Canadian, that we nearly froze to death, in snow-drifts, most of the time, that our next-door neighbors were Indians, that the RCMP rode through our streets like an army of Cossacks, that we have still not paid the bond-holders of the Grand Trunk Railway. We do not know the facts about NFB expenditures, in relationship to production costs and revenue therefrom, we do not know if the National Film Board’s operation is topheavy with expenditures, but looking over the record of our Government, in connection with its Finance, we feel that the National Film Board is not spending this country’s money extravagantly, wastefully, carelessly, unnecessarily. We feel that the operation of the National Film Board requires vouchers for expenditures, that someone in our Government examines these vouchers, and that no one is getting away with anything. The National Film Board started operations from “scratch”. The production of motion pictures is a big business, it is an expensive business. NFB’s War Record is “tops”. An investigation, by competent men, to save operational costs is a reasonable business consideration, but why not investigate, get the facts, get the figures before we blast and publicly spank our Baby? —EDITOR PUBLISHED BY CANADIAN MOVING PICTURE DIGEST COMPANY LIMITED 277 VICTORIA STREET TORONTO i ) A ga . eM P Sm oe p “I ha 4) BS 533 Ke ie mt ie; x Kj cua