Canadian Film Weekly (Jun 28, 1944)

Page scan 0002 from Canadian Film Weekly

Record Details:

Title:
Canadian Film Weekly
Date:
Jun 28, 1944
Volume:
Canadian Film Weekly (Jun 28, 1944)
Leaf #:
0002
Language:
English
Subjects:
Motion Pictures, Film Industry Trade Magazine",Canad
Collection:
Canada, Hollywood Studio System, and Global Cinema
Format:
periodicals
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library, Canadian Picture Pioneers, Paul Moore and Jessica Whitehead
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:

Canadian Film Weekly

  • Editor: Hye Bossin (1942-64)
  • Renamed Canadian Film & TV Bi-Weekly (1965-69, editor: Stan Helleur)
  • Renamed Candian Film Weekly(1970, editor: Ed Hocura)

Canadian Film Weekly (1942-70) was edited by Hye Bossin and published by Film Publications of Canada, Ltd., wholly owned by leading exhibitor, Nat Taylor. In the late 1930s, Taylor was head of the Independent Theatre Association and his Toronto-based chain, Twinex-Century (Twentieth Century), was the largest independent circuit in the country. In 1941, however, he negotiated for chain affiliation with upstart Canadian Odeon before leveraging a better deal and greater booking control with nationally-dominant Famous Players Canada, Ltd. No longer independent, he took ownership of the Independent Theatre Association’s semi-monthly magazine, The Canadian Motion Picture Exhibitor (1940-41), installed Hye Bossin as editor, and laid plans to relaunch in January 1942 under a new name, Canadian Film Weekly. This enduring key publication was no longer solely focused on independent exhibitors but instead covered the entire industry on a national scale–exhibition, distribution and production–with some attention given to studio news from New York and Hollywood.

Bossin was a vibrant writer with a canny way with words, admired in the industry in the United States as well as Canada. He was one of a large family who lived above their father’s secondhand shop in the Jewish “ward” downtown in Toronto. His older brother was a bookie with ties to the underground; his younger brother was a famous journalist, protégé of Walter Winchell, and Hollywood screenwriter. In contrast, Hye spent nearly two decades learning the publishing trade in a printers’ shop before trying a stint as a Hollywood publicist, then writing a column for the Toronto Star Weekly before taking Taylor’s offer to edit the Film Weekly. Bossin was central to the creation of the Canadian Film Archive, the Canadian Film Awards, and he wrote some of the first histories of early cinema in Canada, published in the first volumes of the annual Canadian Film Weekly Year Book (1951-70).

In 1957, the Film Weekly had incorporated the rival Canadian Moving Picture Digest (1917-57), and began dating its start to that paper’s earlier start as the Canadian Universal Bulletin (1915-18). Subsequent variants of the Canadian Film Weekly and its yearbooks always claimed their roots all the way back to 1915 and the origins of the film industry trade press in Canada. After Bossin died in 1964, the Weekly’s new editor, Stan Helleur, renamed the magazine Canadian Film & TV Bi-Weekly, scaling back the pace of publishing but adding a purview for television and broadcasting. The annual was renamed similarly, its subtitle amended to “Year Book of the Canadian Entertainment Industry.” An attempted renewal to weekly format in 1970, edited by Ed Hocura, was short-lived and Nat Taylor decided instead to relaunch under an entirely new title, Canadian Film Digest (1971-77) and Canadian Film Digest Yearbook (1971-86).

– Paul Moore, March 2024

Further Reading

  • Bossin, Hye. “Canada and the Film: The Story of the Canadian Motion Picture Industry.” In Canadian Film Weekly Year Book of the Canadian Motion Picture Industry, 21-41. Toronto: Film Publications of Canada, 1951.
  • Moore, Paul. “Chronicling a National History: Hye Bossin’s Canadian Film Weekly and Year Book.” In Eric Hoyt and Kelley Conway, eds., Global Movie Magazines. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2024.

Date Added:
August 01, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

‘ | THE PICK OF THE PICTURES |} Vol. 9, No, 26 Holmes and the Spider Woman with Basil Rathbone, Nigel Bruce Universal 62 Mins. LATEST SHERLOCK HOLMES PIC IS AMONG BEST OF THE SERIES; TOUCH OF HORROR HELPS. A touch of horror makes this one of the best of the Sherlock Holmes series of melodramas, The story has been worked out with considerable suspense without losing any of the pleasantly humorous touches that have come to be expected of a film that throws Sherlock and his pal, Dr. Watson, together. Using a story by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle as a foundation, Bertram Millhauser has built an entertaining and exciting tale of black villainy. Holmes’ bait this time is a series of deaths listed as suicides. Our sleuth cries murder and sets out to prove it. What is more, he is certain a woman is at the bottom of the dirty work. How he goes about proving his case is quite interesting, not to say deucedly clever. It doesn’t take long to find his woman—thanks to his disguising himself as a rich officer in the Indian army. The lady makes the mistake of trying to give the ‘Indian” the business. The woman's racket is to loan a prospective victim money on his life insurance and then getting a venomous spider to put the bite on him. Unable to bear the agony, the fellow then obligingly does away with himself. Neat, hey what? Sherlock falls into the clutches of the villainess and her cohorts and is almost “done in” by a diabolically ingenious means before the lady and her boys are brought to book. Basil Rathbone gives his standard performance as Sherlock. Nigel Bruce again is good for many chuckles as Watson. Gale Sondergaard plays the villainess acceptably. Inspector Lestrade once more is enacted nicely by Dennis Hoey. CAST: Basil Rathbone, Nigel Bruce, Gale Sondergaard, Dennis Hoey, Vernon Downing, Alec Craig, Mary Gordon, Arthur Hohl, Teddy Infubr. DIRECTION, Good. PHOTOGRAPHY, Good. Warner Bros. Enter Television Field Warner Bros. Pictures Corp. last week filed an application for a television station at KFWB, Hollywood. The company plans a television studio on its film production Iot at Burbank, Calirornia. REVIEWS FROM FILM DAILY, NEW YORK This Is the Life with Donald O’Connor, Susanna Foster Universal 87 Mins. MUSICAL ROMANCE CONTAINING WIDE VARIETY OF ENTERTAINMENT 1S TOP O'CONNOR PIC; FOSTER GAL BIG HIT. Although the young star is curbed somewhat and not allowed completely to dominate the proceedings, “This Is the Life” is easily the best of the Donald O’Connor films. Greater attention to production details, a more appealing story, finer musical content and last, but definitely not least, the presence of Susanna Foster, who is paired delightfully with O’Connor in this charming musical romance, which is warm, human entertainment of universal appeal. From “Angela Is 22,” the Sinclair Lewis-Fay Wray play, Wanda Tuchock has extracted a screenplay that presents a romantic triangle involving O’Connor, Miss Foster and Patric Knowles. O’Connor, in love with Miss Foster, finds strong competition in Knowles, a distinguished Army surgeon of middle age on whom the girl has a youthful crush. The action revolves around the boy’s efforts to cure the girl of her infatuation for the older man. This he does by engineering a reconcilia~tion between Knowles and his divorced wife, Louise Allbritton. Finally Miss Foster realizes she is in love with O’Connor, her reunion with him taking place during an Army show. Whether clowning, singing or dancing O’Connor never ceases to be a whopping attraction. Almost as important as he to the success of this film is Miss Foster, who displays her lovely lyric soprano in a variety of musical numbers, including “L’amour, Toujours l’amour”’ of Rudolf Friml and Catherine Chisholm Cushing, the Rodgers-Hart “With a Song in My Heart,” Georges Bizet’s “Open Thy Heart” and the famous “‘Ciribiribin,” all solos, and “It’s the Girl,” a Buddy Pepper-Inez James tune which she sings with O’Connor. The film contains a number of other tunes, among them Walter Donaldson’s “Sundown.” CAST: Denald O'Connor, Susanna Foster, Patric Knowles, Louise Allbritton, Derothy Peterson, Peggy Ryan, Jonathan Hale, Frank Puglia, Eddie Quillan, Maurice Marsac, Otte Hoffman, Frank Jenks, Ray Eberle, Virginia Brissac, Bobby Brooks Quartette. DIRECTION, Geed. PHOTOGRAPHY, Up In Mabel’s Room with Dennis O'Keefe, Marjorie Reynolds, Gail Patrick UA-Smali 76 Mins. FURIOUS AND HILARIOUS FARCE COMEDY RINGS THE BELL SOLIDLY AS POPULAR ENTERTAINMENT. ‘Up in Mabel’s Room,” one of the long string of Al Woods bedroom farces that first served as film material in 1926, pops up again in a screen rewrite that is a solid laugh-getter. In resurrecting the old Otto HarbachWilson Collison stage play Edward Small has provided the exhibitor with a bit of entertainment perfectly geared to the popular taste. Sure-fire comedy situations and crackling gag lines are packed into the screenplay of Tom Reed, the mission of which is purely to make the customers chortle. Those who are weary of war films will find “Up in Mabel’s Room” their special dish. The film has been directed and played at a breathless pace, with things happening fast and furiously. Direction and acting, as well as the writing, capture the real spirit of farce without ever reaching for the objectionable to gain the desired effect. The action revolves around the struggle for possession of a pink silk slip given to Gail Patrick by Dennis O’Keefe in the course of a romance antedating his marriage to Marjorie Reynolds, sweet young thing not too well versed in the ways of the world. The existence of the dainty feminine undergarment stands in the way of the happiness of O'Keefe and Miss Reynolds, who are really deeply in love although one wouldn't think so from the behavior of the girl. The plot calls for a Jot of running in and out of rooms and crawling under beds for the sake of laughs. The story has been developed with extensive use of trigger-fast action. The entanglements are countless, but they are all smoothed out to the complete satisfaction of audience and protagonists. Allan Dwan’'s swift direction has prodded the cast into some first-rate performances, CAST: Marjorie Reynolds, Dennis O'Keefe, Gail Patrick, Mischa Auer, Charlette Greenwood, Lee Bowman, John Hubbard, Binnie Barnes, Janet Lambert, Fred Kohler, Jr.. Harry Hayden, DIRECTION, Good. PHOTOGRAPHY, Good, Big Para Backlog Paramount has a backlog of 20 films in addition to those now in release—a record. | REVIEWS | INFORMATION RATINGS $2.00 Per Annum Henry Aldrich Plays Cupid with Jimmy Lydon, Charles Smith, John Litel, Olive Blakeney Paramount 65 Mins. FAST-MOVING, LA UGHPACKED ATTRACTION WHICH IS ONE OF BEST OF THIS SERIES TO DATE. There’s a wealth of good clean comedy, ranging from the light variety to virtual slapstick, in this latest adventure of the always-in-trouble Henry, a role essayed as usual by Jimmy Lydon. Notwithstanding the screenplay’s getting so involved that it becomes virtually impossible to logically unravel it, “Henry Aldrich Plays Cupid” is one of the best in this series of attractions. Jimmy, who begins piling up more demerits at school than can be safely acquired without facing the tragedy of dismissal, decides that his plight is due to the fact that his institution’s principal is an old crab whose sour disposition is result of being a bachelor. A golden opportunity, in the form of a matrimonial agency, presents itself. Jimmy, facing the necessity of sending a picture of his principal to a number of husband-seekers, and having no such photo to dispatch, hits on the not-se-bright idea of mailing one of a Senator with whom his own father is feuding. One of the recipients of the letter, anonymously signed “Prince Charming,” and enclosing the photo, is Vera Vague, who puts in an appearance. This incriminates the Senator. Arrival of another letter-photo recipient incriminates Jimmy’s father. And sO mix-ups go right down to the finish, at which time Jimmy proves a hero instead of a problem youth. There are lots of laughs and situations spiked with human interest. Hugh Bennett has done a neat job of direction. Photography is fine, and so is the acting of leads and supporting players. CAST: Jimmy Lyden, C : John Litel, Olive ee — dings Bien BB ay Vague, Paul Har . r . et “arri Gladden James, Shirley ta SE tip ata DIRECTION, Neat, PHOTOGRAPHY, ine. Vicary Prizewinner In V-Loan Campaign Les Vicary, Opera House, Orillia, Ontario, last week won first prize of $25 in the Twentieth Century Theatres Victory Loan campaign contest. Mrs, P. Har rison, Capitol, Cobourg, took second prize.