Canadian Film Weekly (Jan 1, 1947)

Page scan 0008 from Canadian Film Weekly

Record Details:

Title:
Canadian Film Weekly
Date:
Jan 1, 1947
Volume:
Canadian Film Weekly (Jan 1, 1947)
Leaf #:
0008
Language:
English
Subjects:
Motion Pictures, Film Industry Trade Magazine",Canad
Collection:
Global Cinema, Canada, and Hollywood Studio System
Format:
periodicals
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library, Canadian Picture Pioneers, Paul Moore and Jessica Whitehead
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:

Canadian Film Weekly

  • Editor: Hye Bossin (1942-64)
  • Renamed Canadian Film & TV Bi-Weekly (1965-69, editor: Stan Helleur)
  • Renamed Candian Film Weekly(1970, editor: Ed Hocura)

Canadian Film Weekly (1942-70) was edited by Hye Bossin and published by Film Publications of Canada, Ltd., wholly owned by leading exhibitor, Nat Taylor. In the late 1930s, Taylor was head of the Independent Theatre Association and his Toronto-based chain, Twinex-Century (Twentieth Century), was the largest independent circuit in the country. In 1941, however, he negotiated for chain affiliation with upstart Canadian Odeon before leveraging a better deal and greater booking control with nationally-dominant Famous Players Canada, Ltd. No longer independent, he took ownership of the Independent Theatre Association’s semi-monthly magazine, The Canadian Motion Picture Exhibitor (1940-41), installed Hye Bossin as editor, and laid plans to relaunch in January 1942 under a new name, Canadian Film Weekly. This enduring key publication was no longer solely focused on independent exhibitors but instead covered the entire industry on a national scale–exhibition, distribution and production–with some attention given to studio news from New York and Hollywood.

Bossin was a vibrant writer with a canny way with words, admired in the industry in the United States as well as Canada. He was one of a large family who lived above their father’s secondhand shop in the Jewish “ward” downtown in Toronto. His older brother was a bookie with ties to the underground; his younger brother was a famous journalist, protégé of Walter Winchell, and Hollywood screenwriter. In contrast, Hye spent nearly two decades learning the publishing trade in a printers’ shop before trying a stint as a Hollywood publicist, then writing a column for the Toronto Star Weekly before taking Taylor’s offer to edit the Film Weekly. Bossin was central to the creation of the Canadian Film Archive, the Canadian Film Awards, and he wrote some of the first histories of early cinema in Canada, published in the first volumes of the annual Canadian Film Weekly Year Book (1951-70).

In 1957, the Film Weekly had incorporated the rival Canadian Moving Picture Digest (1917-57), and began dating its start to that paper’s earlier start as the Canadian Universal Bulletin (1915-18). Subsequent variants of the Canadian Film Weekly and its yearbooks always claimed their roots all the way back to 1915 and the origins of the film industry trade press in Canada. After Bossin died in 1964, the Weekly’s new editor, Stan Helleur, renamed the magazine Canadian Film & TV Bi-Weekly, scaling back the pace of publishing but adding a purview for television and broadcasting. The annual was renamed similarly, its subtitle amended to “Year Book of the Canadian Entertainment Industry.” An attempted renewal to weekly format in 1970, edited by Ed Hocura, was short-lived and Nat Taylor decided instead to relaunch under an entirely new title, Canadian Film Digest (1971-77) and Canadian Film Digest Yearbook (1971-86).

– Paul Moore, March 2024

Further Reading

  • Bossin, Hye. “Canada and the Film: The Story of the Canadian Motion Picture Industry.” In Canadian Film Weekly Year Book of the Canadian Motion Picture Industry, 21-41. Toronto: Film Publications of Canada, 1951.
  • Moore, Paul. “Chronicling a National History: Hye Bossin’s Canadian Film Weekly and Year Book.” In Eric Hoyt and Kelley Conway, eds., Global Movie Magazines. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2024.

Date Added:
August 14, 2025
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE PICK OF. THE PICTURES ~ REVIEWS INFORMATION RATINGS Vol. 12, No. 1 The > Show-Off with Red Skelton, Marilyn Maxwell MGM 84 Mins. THIRD FILM VERSION OF FAMED COMEDY PROVIDES |AMPLE OUTLET FOR RED SKELTON’S ZANY TALENTS. Until another more suitable opus comes along for Red Skelton’s zany talents, “The ShowOff” will keep him in the public eye and mind. It is not so old and hoary that a-good thing cannot come of it at this date. It is'a sound piece of property. Many times imitated, the story is ‘composed of elements that have been hitting the bull’s eye of audience satisfaction for so long that it is no longer necessary to aim them. A quarter of a century ago it was a notable stage play. Twice before it was filmed. This third version provides exercise for Skelton and he plays it for all it is worth. Miss Maxwell is easy to look at, fits the bill. In making an oldie there is always something new thrown into the script. This time it is a burlesque of radio questionnaire programs where participants are paid off—double or nothing. Skelton, endeavoring to raise money to keep the installment collectors happy, gets himself on a toothpaste program. Its the. “Pepsi-Dent” show. Skelton uses “Dr. Webson’s” powder, has used it for years, plans no change. All of which is going out over the air, between questions. This is the high howl of the show. Otherwise it is the biography and early marital life of “Aubrey Piper,” backslapper, talkative reciter of poetry, whose good intentions come to grief until the very end, when they pay off. Comedy lines are handled in the veteran manner associated with Marjorie Main, Hddie “Rochester” Anderson, George Cleveland, Virginia O’Brien. It’s a good show for the family ~ trade. CAST: Red Skelton, Marilyn Maxwell, Marjorie Main, Virginia O’Brien, Eddie “Rochester” Anderson, George Cleveland, Leon Ames, Marshall Thompson, Jacqueline ‘White, Wilson Wood, Lila Leeds, Emory Parnell. CREDITS: Producer, Albert Lewis; Director, Harry Beeumont; Screenplay by George Wells, from the play by George Kelly; Cameraman, Robert Planck. DIRECTION, Good. PHOTOGRAPHY, Good. Peggy Cummins’ Next Peggy Cummins will have the starring role in Fox’ ‘Moss Rose.” TORONTO, JANUARY 1, 1947 Plainsman And the Lady with William Elliott, Vera Ralston Republic 87 Mins. GOOD HISTORICAL WESTERN SHOW ABOUT THE PONY EXPRESS; FINE PRODUCTION VALUES, _INTERESTING PLOT. There’s a wealth of contributing detail in this film. It is colorful, varied and has plenty in the action department. The producer has seen fit to include a fairly large segment of intrigue. Said intrigue involves the inaugurating of the pony express to carry the mails transcontinentally. For the action fans there’s plenty of brawling and -shooting. For the audience that likes its romance in the he-man manner, there’s a good lineup of situations. William Elliott owns a saloongambling joint in St. Joseph, Mo. at the outset. He sells to join the new pony express enterprise. There is opposition to the plan by Joseph Schildkraut and Gail Patrick, wife of one of the promoters who’s double timing with Schildkraut. The scene switches to Washington where the scheme is defeated. Meanwhile Elliott cements his romance with Vera Ralston and horses around for comic effect with Andy Clyde. Don Barry, a killer, is provoked by Schildkraut into making attempts on BHlliott’s life but they never quite come off. Meanwhile the groundwork and initial surveys for the line to Sacramento are set. Miss Patrick’s unfaithfulness causes the death of her husband, Reinhold Schunzel. Miss Patrick takes over his bank and attempts to freeze out the express line. But Elliott makes his stand and she has to leave town with Schildkraut. The line begins operation, From either end riders leave. Elliott and Clyde are out reconnoitering and come upon evidence of dirty work. They break up a Schildkraut-inspired raid with a troop of Indians who are out to avenge the killing of one of their number. The express and mail get through. There's rejoicing and Elliott and Miss Ralston hit it off for the romantic trail. CAST: William Elliott, Vera Ralston, Gail Patrick, Joseph Schildkraut, Andy Clyde, Don Barry, Raymond Walburn, Russell Hicks, Paul Hurst, Charles Judels, CREDITS: Producer and Director, Joseph Kane; Screenplay by Richard Wormser; Cameraman, Reggie Lanning. DIRECTION, Good, PHOTOGRAPHY, ine. , 20th-Fox . CAST: Henry Fonda, My Darling Clementine with Henry Fonda, Linda Darnell, Victor Mature 97 Mins. OUTSTANDING SUPER-WESTERN; SHOULD PROVE HIGHLY EFFECTIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT THE NATION’S BOXOFFICE. If “My Darling Clementine” does not prove to be the very pinnacle of western production and direction it may be only because the next one to surpass it will be from the directorial talents of John Ford. Ford has taken every trick in the book, polished, sharpened, honed and curried them. The resultant tale of the Earp Brothers is something erudite critics will dissect for finer nuances of cinematic criticism. And those hyper-critics, the western fans, whose diet has been the ham and eggs of the industry, will be impressed by its near-zenith development. Photographically “Clementine” impresses as just about the best black and white treatment from Hollywood this year and will stand to be a keen contender for camera honors. The story has a_ historical background being the interpretation of Wyatt Earp, played by Fonda, and his brothers, Tim Holt, Ward Bond, who come to Tombstone and pacify the cattletown while they seek the murderers of another brother, Don Garner. Fonda takes the marshal’s job. The town quiets under his ministrations. Victor Mature, a consumptive renegade doctor from the East, runs Tombstone and has a reputation as a killer. But at first sight he and Fonda hit it off, become friends. Miss Darnell is Mature’s mistress. Cathy Downs comes from the East to rehabilitate Mature. But he thinks different. In due time Miss Darnell furnishes the clues for the real culprits. She dies. Holt is killed. Next morning the Walter Brennan family is wiped out, Mature dies. There’s a great deal more to it than that but space limits detailed telling. Linda Darnell, Victor Mature, Walter Brennan, Tim Holt, Ward Bond, Cathy Downs, Alan Mowbray, John Ireland, Roy Roberts, Jane Darwell, Grant Withers. CREDITS: Producer, Samuel G. Engel; Director, John Ford; Screenplay by Samuel G. Engel, Winston Miller; Based on a story by Sam Hellman from a book by Stuort N. Lake; Joe MacDonald. < DIRECTION, Aces. PHOTOGRAPHY, Superb. Cameraman, $2.00 Per Annum Cross My Heart | with Betty Hutton, Sonny Tufts Paramount 83 Mins. HILARIOUS PARODY OF THE MURDER COURTROOM DRAMA; SNAPPILY PACED, SMARTLY HANDLED; HAS CLICK POTENTIALITIES. Having served as basic plot for countless tear-jerking dramas and last-minute rescues from the “hot seat,’’ the murdercourtroom melodrama has finally been given the hypo and it evolves here as a gagstrewn farce that is never serious more than two minutes and that’s just because it is necessary to supply brickwork for the plot. Betty Hutton has a field day romancing with Sonny Tufts, her lawyer boy-friend, singing a couple of effective numbers in her loud comedy style and being the “Peggy Harper” around whom all the didoes revolve. It’s Miss Hutton’s picture all the way with slight bows to Michael Chekhov as a crazy Shakesperian actor, Miss Hutton is a hoofer. Tufts, a struggling lawyer. In order to get a good setup for Tufts she tries to play around with Howard Freeman, a wolf of the first water. She runs into Chekhov at Freeman’s place. Chekhov pretends to leave. Freeman chases Miss Hutton all over the place with nefarious designs. Next thing Freeman is murdered and Miss Hutton arrested when she returns to pick up her hat and purse. She sees a golden opportunity for Tufts and prepares to go on trial for the murder. The trial proves a storm session of laughter with all sorts of novelty and slick satiric touches thrown into the court record. She’s not guilty. Tufts learns she did it all for him, perjuring herself so he could gain notoriety. He cools. Meanwhile she gets a nite spot engagement. An attack of conscience causes her to reveal the truth, which is quite innocent and in so doing the real murderer is taken—to the nuthouse— for an extended engagement of “Othello.” It all stems, it seems, from Miss Hutton’s inability to tell the truth. CAST: Betty Hutton, Sonny Tufts, Rhys Williams, Alan Bridge, Howard Freeman, Lewis L. Russell, Michael Chekhov, Iris Adrian. CREDIIS: Producer, Director, John Berry; Based on a play by Louis Verneuil and Georges Barr; Cameramen, Charles Land and Stuart Thompson. DIRECTION, Very Good. PHOTOGRAPHY, Fine. Harry Tugend;