Canadian Film Weekly (Nov 17, 1948)

Page scan 0008 from Canadian Film Weekly

Record Details:

Title:
Canadian Film Weekly
Date:
Nov 17, 1948
Volume:
Canadian Film Weekly (Nov 17, 1948)
Leaf #:
0008
Language:
English
Subjects:
Motion Pictures, Film Industry Trade Magazine",Canad
Collection:
Global Cinema, Canada, and Hollywood Studio System
Format:
periodicals
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library, Canadian Picture Pioneers, Paul Moore and Jessica Whitehead
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:

Canadian Film Weekly

  • Editor: Hye Bossin (1942-64)
  • Renamed Canadian Film & TV Bi-Weekly (1965-69, editor: Stan Helleur)
  • Renamed Candian Film Weekly(1970, editor: Ed Hocura)

Canadian Film Weekly (1942-70) was edited by Hye Bossin and published by Film Publications of Canada, Ltd., wholly owned by leading exhibitor, Nat Taylor. In the late 1930s, Taylor was head of the Independent Theatre Association and his Toronto-based chain, Twinex-Century (Twentieth Century), was the largest independent circuit in the country. In 1941, however, he negotiated for chain affiliation with upstart Canadian Odeon before leveraging a better deal and greater booking control with nationally-dominant Famous Players Canada, Ltd. No longer independent, he took ownership of the Independent Theatre Association’s semi-monthly magazine, The Canadian Motion Picture Exhibitor (1940-41), installed Hye Bossin as editor, and laid plans to relaunch in January 1942 under a new name, Canadian Film Weekly. This enduring key publication was no longer solely focused on independent exhibitors but instead covered the entire industry on a national scale–exhibition, distribution and production–with some attention given to studio news from New York and Hollywood.

Bossin was a vibrant writer with a canny way with words, admired in the industry in the United States as well as Canada. He was one of a large family who lived above their father’s secondhand shop in the Jewish “ward” downtown in Toronto. His older brother was a bookie with ties to the underground; his younger brother was a famous journalist, protégé of Walter Winchell, and Hollywood screenwriter. In contrast, Hye spent nearly two decades learning the publishing trade in a printers’ shop before trying a stint as a Hollywood publicist, then writing a column for the Toronto Star Weekly before taking Taylor’s offer to edit the Film Weekly. Bossin was central to the creation of the Canadian Film Archive, the Canadian Film Awards, and he wrote some of the first histories of early cinema in Canada, published in the first volumes of the annual Canadian Film Weekly Year Book (1951-70).

In 1957, the Film Weekly had incorporated the rival Canadian Moving Picture Digest (1917-57), and began dating its start to that paper’s earlier start as the Canadian Universal Bulletin (1915-18). Subsequent variants of the Canadian Film Weekly and its yearbooks always claimed their roots all the way back to 1915 and the origins of the film industry trade press in Canada. After Bossin died in 1964, the Weekly’s new editor, Stan Helleur, renamed the magazine Canadian Film & TV Bi-Weekly, scaling back the pace of publishing but adding a purview for television and broadcasting. The annual was renamed similarly, its subtitle amended to “Year Book of the Canadian Entertainment Industry.” An attempted renewal to weekly format in 1970, edited by Ed Hocura, was short-lived and Nat Taylor decided instead to relaunch under an entirely new title, Canadian Film Digest (1971-77) and Canadian Film Digest Yearbook (1971-86).

– Paul Moore, March 2024

Further Reading

  • Bossin, Hye. “Canada and the Film: The Story of the Canadian Motion Picture Industry.” In Canadian Film Weekly Year Book of the Canadian Motion Picture Industry, 21-41. Toronto: Film Publications of Canada, 1951.
  • Moore, Paul. “Chronicling a National History: Hye Bossin’s Canadian Film Weekly and Year Book.” In Eric Hoyt and Kelley Conway, eds., Global Movie Magazines. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2024.

Date Added:
August 21, 2025
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE PICK OF THE PICTURES Vol. 18, No. 44 An Innocent . Affair with Madeleine Carroll, Fred MacMurray United Artists 90 mins. LIVENED BY SLICK GAGS, TOP PERFORMING, FIRST-RATE PRODUCTION, THIS ONE STANDS TO DO BETTER THAN AVERAGE BUSINESS. Enlivened considerably by the intrusion into the plot of a few slick gags, this comedy of marital complications makes the grade as light entertainment close enough to the forefront of its type to do better than average business. Madeleine Carroll returns after a lengthy absence. She gives her role what is required. Fred MacMurray, when the yarn opens, has been chasing down an advertising account with a “Mr. Fraser.’ Miss Carroll doesn’t like the late hours and their fifth anniversary is coming up. MacMurray, while he has been running around with Louise Allbritton, has also been attending strictly to business. MacMurray’s duplicity is soon discovered by Miss Carroll and in cahoots with Rita Johnson, they attempt to teach the straying husband a lesson. They hire an actor to show more than friendly interest in the neglected wife. Celebrating their anniversary, MacMurray and Madeleine meet up with Charles ‘Buddy’ Rogers, a cigarette tycoon who is mistaken for the hired ham. This, of course, leads to a good deal of confusion. From that point on the proceedings take on the aspect of a merry mixup which in due process leads to divorce proceedings on Miss Carroll’s part. In time husband and wife get over the nonsense and there is a reasonable explanation. Basically, the theme derives from the thought — tell a woman the truth and she won’t believe you. Tell her a lie and you stand a better chance. But don’t involve too many females while you are at it, because something is likely to blow up in your face. CAST: Fred MacMurray, Madeleine Carroll, Charles ‘‘Buddy’” Rogers, Rita Johnson, Louise Allbritton, Alan Mowbray. CREDITS: Producer, James Nasser; Director, Lloyd Bacon; Original screenflay, Lou Breslow, Joseph Hoffman; Photography, Edward Cronjager. DIRECTION: Good. PHOTOGRAPHY: Good. To Direct "Lucasta’ Irving Rapper will direct Cojumbia’s “Anna Lucasta.” * VOICE of the CANADIAN MOTION PICTURE INDUSTAaY REVIEWS FROM FILM DAILY, NEW YORK June Bride with Bette Davis, Robert Montgomery Warners 97 Mons. FUNNY, ROLLICKING ROMANCE ESTABLISHES MISS DAVIS IN THE FRONT ROW OF NEW SEASON ATTRACTIONS THAT WILL MAKE FINE BOXOFFICE MUSIC. ; With this sprightly comedy Bette Davis, with a fine assist by Robert Montgomery, once more establishes in the row of new season attractions that will niake fine boxoffice music. It is a grand, funny, rollicking romance highly provocative of the laughter element which is what audiences want, don’t get too often these days, should demand. It is the battle of the sexes again. There’s also about a half dozen situations well loaded with broad humor that has been assembled and displayed with keen timing and construction. As a foreign correspondent, Robert Montgomery returns from Berlin. Things have cooled for his special talents and with some reluctance he takes a new post as feature writer on a home magazine edited by Miss Davis, the girl he walked out on years before. Gayly he invades her lair, tries to warm over their past romance, is brushed off and soon applies himself to the business at hand—a story in picture and word of a “June Bride” in Indiana who has_ conveniently agreed to get herself married in winter for publicity purposes. To Indiana goes Miss Davis and staff. In short order plenty in the way of young love is generated, cross purposes are created, the planned events get fouled up via the intrusions of Betty Lynn and company. Even Miss Davis and Montgomery get more than chummy before eruption takes place. Betwixt the doings there is much fun bandied, in due time leading the path of story development to where the bride runs off and elopes with her true love, the groom marries Miss Lynn. With the issue safely up and ready for the printer, Montgomery and Bette come to an understanding. She admits defeat, agrees he is the pants wearer, meekly submits to him as lord and master. CAST: Bette Davis, Robert Montgomery, Fay Bainter, Betty Lynn, Tom Tully, Barbara Bates, Jerome Cowan, Mary Wickes. CREDITS: Producer, Henry Blanke; Director, Bretaigne Windust; Screenplay, Ranald MacDougall; Based on a play by Eileen Tighe, Graeme Lorimer; Photog: raphy, Ted McCord. DIRECTION: Fine, PHOTOGRAPHY: Very good, Cry of the City with Victor Mature, Richard Conte 2¢th-Fox 95 Mins. VERY WELL PLAYED CRIMEDOES-NOT-PAY DRAMA WITH ACTUAL LOCALES. MATURE, CONTE VERY GOOD. DIRECTION HITS HIGH MOMENTS OF SUSPENSE, INTENSITY. Here once again is another starkly handled crime-does-notpay theme wherein a vicious criminal in due course gets his lumps via a police bullet. He is a thoroughly unsympathetic character, cruel, scheming, ruthless. On the other hand there is a cop, systematic, inquiring and fact finding who adds up one element on top of another and comes out of the mess with the criminal lined up in his gunsights. Introduced as a wounded cop killer, Richard Conte shows up in a hospital about to undergo surgery. His tearful family is about. He is given last rites. But he comes through and after being transferred to a prison ward, he breaks out. His first step is to kill a shady lawyer who is trying to implicate his girl in a jewel robbery-murder. He gets some money and the jewelry, sets out to locaie the female who actually had a part in the caper. He hardly makes it. His wounds open and he almost passes out. An unlicensed medico patches him up for $200. Victor Mature in the interim has not been asleep at headquarters and methodically has been picking up fragments here and there which begin to shape up and point the finger which is found at the end of the long arm of the law — and coincidence. Conte makes the mistake of crossing up Hope Emerson and barely gets away when the cops take her. He finally arranges to meet his true love, Debra Paget, for whom he has plans other than his deceptive affection indicates. This rendezvous is interrupted by Mature. It is in a church and Mature has left his sickbed to be there. It proves to be the payoff for Conte who eludes the weakened Mature for a moment. Quick flying hot lead catches up with him. CAST: Victor Mature, Richard Conte, Fred Clark, Shelley Winters, Betty Garde, Berry Kreoger, Tommy Cook. CREDITS: Producer, Sol C. Siegel; Director, Robert Siodmak; Screenplay, Richard Murphy; From a novel by Henry Edward Elseth; Photography, Lloyd Ahern. DIRECTION: Good, PHOTOGRAPHY: Very Good, $2.00 Per Annum Apartment For Peggy with Jeanne Crain, William Holden, Edmund Gwenn. 20th-Fox (Technicolor) 99 Mins. SOCKSTUFF SHOWMEN CAN YELL THEIR HEADS OFF PRAISING THIS CNE — AND TRUTHFULLY TOO. WATCH “PEGGY” BREAK OFF A LARGE CHUNK OF NEW-SEASON BIZ. CLASS A PRODUCTION. VERY WELL PLAYED. “Apartment for Peggy” is such a good thing in the collection of new films that the showman can yell his head off truthfully singing its praises. In the top roles Miss Crain, Holden and Gwenn are in their best form. The supporting cast structure is well set up, too. It is a Class A production in every segment. . Playing the talkative wife of Holden, Miss Crain, an expectant mother — and no silly bones are made about her condition — talks Gwenn into letting his attic as they have to vacate trailer premises. Holden’s ambition and goal is to become a teacher — a career he decided upon while clinging to a life raft in the Pacific during the war. Miss Crain is willing to stand by him and see him attain his heart’s desire athough her lot is neither comfortable nor desirable. It is Holden’s endeavor to help the’ world overcome its prejudices and intolerance via enlightenment and Miss Crain is not only very much in love with him but also with his ideal. Gwenn, however, has been a philosopher many years, feels his place in the world superfluous. His colleagues on the faculty try to talk him out of it but he secretly plans and lays away a supply of sleeping pills. But with the intrusion of the Holdens things brighten up considerably and he makes himself a part of their lives. Miss Crain loses her baby at birth. This sets Holden off on a new path. He gives up his primary purpose and seeks the dollar. A visit by Gwenn brings him back later, but not until after Gwenn tried what he thought would be suicide. It turns out his colleaguephysician faked the capsules and had them filled with a laxative. Of course in short order things work out for all concerned. CAST: Jeanne Crain, William Holden, Edmund Gwenn, Gene Lockhart, Griff Barnett, Randy Stuart, Marion Marshall. CREDITS: Producer, William Perlberg; Directed and written for the screen by George Seaton; From a story by Faith Baldwin; Photography, Harry Jack son. DIRECTION, Fine, PHOTOGRAPHY, Very good,