Celluloid : the film to-day (1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

38 CELLULOID deal of cleverness has gone to their making. They are definitely sophisticated in their appeal because the Americans are no longer making films for the " hick " mind. This is largely because the small cinemas of the United States are rapidly disappearing and their patrons are going to the larger towns which boast a super-house equipped with sound. Consequently, the " intellectual " value of stories has slightly improved with the development of the talking films, and generally speaking direction to-day is more subtle and refined than it was a few years back. But in England we are for ever stopping to consider if we are being too highbrow. Our studio-executives attempt to play down to a hypothetical and totally false idea of the public's intelligence. In actuality, the public is far too intelligent to be satisfied with the undressed immaturity of British films. It is accustomed to the smooth polish and high mechanical efficiency of the American cinema and dislikes the ingenuousness of most of the British product. Despite their superiority, however, American producers have themselves reached the point where they do not know what to do next. As I have explained earlier, they are at their wit's end to find a new angle on the cinema public. Such divergent productions as Abraham Lincoln, Animal Crackers and Morocco are shots at random to test the public's reactions. Shortly, perhaps, producers will realize that they would do well to listen to the theorists of experience, who know a great deal more about the appeal of the cinema to the public than the producers, the latter being concerned almost solely with the business