Celluloid : the film to-day (1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

PROPAGANDA AND THE CINEMA 47 graphers whose theme or dramatic content is supplied to them, than by those directors who seek merely to provide ephemeral entertainment from literary stories. In the American cinema, such notable films as The Big Parade and All Quiet on the Western Front, both marking definite progress from a technical point of view, were at heart propagandist in aim. It is well to recall also that Flaherty's first film Nanoo\ of the North was sponsored by a fur company as incidental propaganda. To instance a more familiar sphere of activity, it is common knowledge that the whole aesthetic and artistic merit of the Soviet cinema has been brought about solely by Russia's urgent need of propaganda for an education in Bolshevism. Five or six years ago, a Russian called Lev Kuleshov arrived at the logical conclusion that what really mattered in making a film were the celluloid strips out of which a film was made. The actors, actresses and the scenery were of small value as compared with the scientific handling — the inter-juxtaposition — of the basic celluloid cut with scissors and joined with film cement. Even the story itself was of secondary importance. This method was, and still is, diametrically opposed to the American and British ideas of film production. From this elementary conclusion which, with due deference to all film producers of to-day, should have been grasped years before the War from the early experiments of Griffith, there have been derived the constructive, scientific methods of technique which have made the Soviet cinema celebrated and are acknowledged as the foundation-principles of cinematography.