Celluloid : the film to-day (1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

100 CELLULOID on a fragment of paper torn from the hoop through which the girl jumped, all that remained of the circus ring and his loved one. He shrugged his shoulders as only Chaplin can, flicked his cane, and cheerfully walked away into the distance in his inimitable manner as the screen darkened. From that empty field he has come to a great city and, homeless as usual, found shelter for the night in an about-to-be unveiled statue. Yet again he falls in love, this time it would seem with more success. In fact, the suspense of the ending of City Lights gives many people reason to believe that this film is his swan song, the end of all things, which I do not believe. If City Lights be regarded from a detached point of view, and if for a moment we are indifferent to Chaplin's engaging personality, we shall see that it is quite different in texture from any other current picture of American origin, and in particular from the comedies of Harold Lloyd and Buster Keaton. There is no quality in it to suggest that it was produced in the neighbourhood of Hollywood. It does not bear the American studio imprint as do most American films, especially the comedies of Lloyd and Keaton. It might, for instance, have been made in England, with the exception of one or two minor points such as the policemens' uniforms and scavengers' clothes. It might be a film of any city or a synthesis of all cities. This international quality which distinguishes all Chaplin's films is, I think, worth considerable