Censored : the private life of the movie (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE ARGUMENT FOR THE PURE VI The Nationalists ALTHOUGH the mere itemization of the cuts made by the censors as shown in the previous chapters and the roll call of the censors themselves are sufficient to condemn for most people this kind of governmental restraint, there nevertheless remain some few persons who argue that the objectionable features of our present censorship arise solely from a lack of uniformity. Men like Canon Chase urge that if censorship is not working today the sole reason for the failure lies in the fact that we have failed to enact a nation-wide uniform censorship law. He would abolish the state lines and he would concentrate censorship in 136