Censored : the private life of the movie (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE URGE FOR GOOD enforcement by only 100,000 they rejected movie censorship by 344,000. Calvin Coolidge came out flatly against a Federal Interstate Censorship bill in 1926. If Dr. Wilson had so spoken in 1915 the Supreme Court might not have reached the opinion that the common-sense of the people supported censorship of the films. Since 1922 no state legislation for censorship has been possible. The hosts of Canon Chase can make no headway against movie fans. But a new power, a new control has climbed into the saddle. And legislatures and the public have been hanging to the stirrups. The urge for good has passed out of the pulpit. It now permeates the conference room. In ten years, a new economic power, an undreamed of master, has employed the simple fears and the ancient tools of the censor. At a time when prudery and propaganda seem worn to a thin fabric, a new power has stepped in to give life and strength to the powers of darkness. It is the corporation. 171