Censored : the private life of the movie (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

PRIVATE LIFE OF THE MOVIE seen that board in action. Needless to point out, a play with any political, social, or moral rebellion in it hasn't a prayer in Pennsylvania. Of course, we would hardly expect to find the producers fighting censorship in 1929 when they have accepted ignominiously this condition ever since the industry started. The playwrights and actors hired away from the theatre usually enter Hollywood with a "whatthe-hell, it's the movies" attitude, so one can expect no protest from them. It is the customer who receives the insult, the emasculated reproduction of drama. There are those who delight in the awkward state of the talkies, and hold that censorship and mechanical imperfections will make the talkies so obnoxious the public will flock to the theatre. "Garbage" they call the movies. Very well, consider the heap, and analyze the stench. Not artistically, as some minor critics have cried, but financially, the talking movies are poisoning the theatre. 180