Charlie Chaplin (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

X I "A Dog's Life" — first masterpiece Chaplin's opening First National film, "A Dog's Life," was his best up to that time, his first real masterpiece. The techniques he had been experimenting with and perfecting, these four years, were now applied with complete mastery; and his style was at the ripening point of fullness and flavor. Its special quality of the commingling smile and sigh characterized the picture throughout, instead of in flashes as in the previous "The Tramp," "The Vagabond," and "The Immigrant." Pathos is now emphasized in the three-reel "A Dog's Life." It is a prototype of his great features, "The Gold Rush" and "City Lights." The treatment is realistic; caricature is sparing. In fact, "A Dog's Life" is conceived and played almost as straight drama. Its story line is firm and logical. It has suspense and clear plot resolutions. Its mixture of pathos and laughter derives from ingenuities and surprises in poignant situations, as Chaplin leads a "dog's life" almost literally, as well as figuratively. Delluc, the French critic, acclaims "this pieta" as the cinema's "first complete work of art." (The Griffith classics, however, had not yet reached France when this was written.) Profound philosophy and social satire have been seen in "A Dog's Life" by other critics. The general parallel between the vagabond's life and the dog's life is made powerfully specific in the daring juxtaposition of the frantic scene in the employment office and the dog