Cinema Canada (Jun 1978)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

the best film policy this country never had by Sandra Gathercole Privately, members of the industry recognize John Roberts’ Film Policy as a non-policy. It did not meet the expectations nor justify the fears which had been voiced in so many sectors. Sandra Gathercole’s analysis puts the Policy in an historical perspective. There is a story, perhaps apocryphal, of a 1965 Canada-U:S. partnership agreement negotiated by America’s Livingston Merchant and Canada’s Arnold Heeney. Halfway through the numerous clauses (Heeney having conceded every one of them to the U.S.) Livingston Merchant leaned across the table and said, “You take this one for Canada, Arnold. It will look good when you get home.” Over the years, the Canadian Government’s record of success in negotiations with American government and business interests has been a running joke. The Americans have come to know and love us as the country which, given an inch, will take half an inch and go away happy. Rather like the good old days when the Indians sold Manhattan Island for $24 in trinkets. The Indians, of course, woke up long ago. American control of Canadian cinemas has epitomized the syndrome. Canadian movie houses we1e built to show Se ee eee eee schmnremetnomceanpsnecniannsngtinieentensesronnetannis Sandra Gathercole was chairperson of the Council of Canadian Filmmakers for several years, Recently, she has worked for the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission editing the Grierson tapes. 28/Cinema Canada American movies and have remained a territorial monopoly for American distributors. Canada is Hollywood’s number one foreign market, paying 93 percent of all theatrical film rentals to the likes of Paramount and Warner Bros. Approximately 1-1/2 percent of the massive $240 million annual Canadian box office goes to Canadian film production which is thus limited and chronically under-financed. For 50 years, the Canadian government has been bemoan ing the situation: “For years I have been convinced that the film situation is one of very great danger to this Dominion...” Prime Minister R.B. Bennett September 16, 1931 For 30 years, the government has been threatening to do something about it. In 1948 there was the Canadian Cooperation Project: Hollywood’s response to pressure from MacKenzie King, C.D. Howe and Louis St.. Laurent (later a member of the Board of Famous Players) to leave behind some of the millions they were extracting from the Canadian box office. This was the first “voluntary agreement” and Pierre Berton enshrined it in Hollywood’s Canada as “what