The cinema : 1952 (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Tour Critic Right or Wrong i Film critics, unlike the chief critics of literature or art, seldom argue either in person or on paper about the principles of the art they claim to take so seriously. Gavin Lambert, formerly editor of Sequence and now in charge oftlie British Film Institute's publications, including Sight and Sound, has consented first of all to write his comments upon (and his disagreements with) a number of important points about the responsibilities of film critics raised by Roger Manvell in the first piece which follows in this section. Jack Beddington, who was for four years in charge of film production for the Ministry of Information, and is now Chairman of the Film Selection Sub-Committee of the National Film Library, contributes a third and quite independent point of view, with his comments on Roger Manveil's and Gavin Lambert's articles. ROGER MANVELL The subject for discussion with Gavin Lambert is : Of what use is the film critic to the public and to the film-maker, and from what source, rightly or wrongly, does he derive his standards of criticism. The critic in the past was usually either a philosopher (like Plato, Aristotle, or Lessing) or, alternatively, himself a practising artist or writer who turned aside now and then to consider the aesthetic principles of his art (like Leonardo da Vinci, Sir Joshua Reynolds, Keats, Wordsworth, and