The cinema : 1952 (1952)

Record Details:

Title:
The cinema : 1952
Date:
1952
Publisher:
Harmondsworth : Penguin Books
Volume:
The cinema : 1952
Leaf #:
000238
Language:
English
Collection:
Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Niles Essanay Silent Film Museum
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
March 21, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MICHAEL CLARKE Television Prospect Some Reflexions of a Documentary Film-ma^er Michael Clarke, documentary director and writer on film and literary subjects, has had a varied experience as scriptwriter, editor, and director in documentary. At present on the staff of the Films Section, British Transport Commission, he has recently directed^ ork in Progress and Open House, as well as several technical films . In this article he discusses the aesthetic and social future of television. Is television an art-form? Is it a medium? Can we begin to elaborate an aesthetic for it? Is it going to revolutionize our home-life or our social habits? Will it replace the cinema? Will it kill the theatre? Should it entertain? Should it teach? Should it inform? In a disordered spate, these and other questions tumble from the columns of the press, showing the effect that television begins to have on the public mind. The contribution of the press, indeed, is bound to influence the popular attitude to television, perhaps as much as the B.B.G. itself. For televison is news, and as such is subjected to the glamourizing process. At the same time, this powerful force for commercial advertisement and political persuasion is out of private hands, and is thus subject to the fiercest criticism. Yet B.B.C. television has had only eight years of active