The cinema as a graphic art : on a theory of representation in the cinema (1959)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE COMPOSITIONAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHOT 53. Eugene's foreshortened face. A close-up, face the camera. Diagonal composition. 54. ' Editing formula ' for Eugene's crushing under)t. Three cutting pieces. The first piece shows the rse's hoofs, taken very close up, with a short-focus is (focal length — 28 mm.). Strong optical distortion. 54«. Second piece : The horse's muzzle, taken on ge scale. Shot with the same lens giving strong tical foreshortening. 546. Peter's face and burning eyes. Very short tting piece. i 55. Eugene's eyes, on very large scale. Diagonal mposition, the same diagonal as that of the close-up Eugene in shot 53. Sharp optical delineation, harsh, itrasted lighting. 56. Repetition of the ' editing formula ' for crushing Jerfoot, but in the contrary order. First cutting !ce; Peter's face strongly foreshortened. 97