The cinema as a graphic art : on a theory of representation in the cinema (1959)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CHAPTER THREE :REATIVE PROBLEMS OF THE CAMERA-MAN'S art 1. THE 'REPRODUCTION' PERIOD "|N order to elucidate the chief tendencies of development of the cameraman's art in the period of the birth of cinema, we must briefly deal with the history of photography, for it is here that the first creative impulses of cinema camera-man have their beginning. From the very first days of photography there were two main tendencies in it development. On the one hand it was accorded universal recognition as a rrans of scientific investigation, of exact documentation of the object photog phed. At the same time, photography was given its rightful, and honourable pjce among the other previously existing representational arts as a new method s: artistic representation. The varied possibilities of photography were realised from the very earliest j s of its existence. Gay Lussac, who on July joth i8jg expressed his opinion I Daguerre's invention, thus defined photography's future role. Daguerre's method will undoubtedly have extensive application ; artists will use it fc the manifestation of forms, designers as a perfect pattern for perspective and for studying tr distribution of light and shade, natural scientists for study of the various kinds of animals u plants and their construction. In its further development photography brilliantly confirmed Lussac 's e: lectations. There is hardly a sphere of natural science in which it does not p y a considerable part as a means of scientific investigation. Wherever photog phy has fulfilled the exact and definite tasks of scientific investigation and d :umentalisation, it has invariably earned high commendation as a perfect tr thod of representation. The position is a little different in regard to the development of photography a: i specific form of representational art. The pioneer of photography, Daguerre, Wi a painter by profession. Working in the studio of the decorator Degotti, as es'ly as 1822, he tried to find a more perfect method of representation than that 0 Portrait painting. When he discovered a technique of photography he at once a >lied it as a means of artistic reproduction of a portrait, and his first work in Is direction obtained general recognition as genuine examples of art. After E guerre, the English artist, David Octavius Hill, in 1843-5 created a number 0 photographic portraits which aroused universal admiration by their artistic and nlistic qualities. 137