The cinema and the public: a critical analysis of the origin, constitution, and control of the British Film Institute (1934)

Record Details:

Title:
The cinema and the public: a critical analysis of the origin, constitution, and control of the British Film Institute
Date:
1934
Publisher:
London : Ivor Nicholson and Watson Limited
Volume:
The cinema and the public : a critical analysis of the origin, constitution, and control of the "British Film Institute"
Leaf #:
00044
Language:
English
Collection:
Global Cinema, Books, United Kingdom, and Government & Law
Format:
Books
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Date Added:
March 21, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

APPENDIX A. The Clause in the Memorandum of Association of " The British Film Institute " to which reference is made on pages 24-27 in the text. Section III — Paragraph 4. " Provided further that the Institute shall neither seek to control nor attempt to interfere with purely trade matters in the Film Industry or with the censorship of films for public entertainment. If three or more members of the Council or Governing Body of the Institute are not satisfied that, in a particular instance, this principle is being observed, such members of the Council shall be at liberty to refer the matter to the determination of a single arbitrator to be agreed between the parties or in case of dispute to be nominated by the President of the Law Society and such reference shall be deemed to be a reference to arbitration within the meaning of the Arbitration Act, 1889, or any statutory modification thereof." Page 40