Cinematographic annual : 1931 (1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

PROJECTION ARCS* A. C. Downes and \V. C. Kalb** IN THE early years of the motion picture industry large size, low intensity carbons were used for light projection in theatres. Since then the low intensity lamps using large size carbons have been almost entirely replaced by the low intensity reflecting arc lamps, the high intensity reflecting arc lamps, and the high intensity condenser type lamps. In the last few years the need for more light even in the smaller theatres has been augmented by various factors such as the use of perforated sound screens, colored films, and the demand for a higher level of general illumination. Carbon manufacturers have endeavored to aid the situation in the smaller theatres by recently developing low intensity reflecting arc carbons which carry higher currents than those previously available. It is believed that data on the characteristics of these carbons and their application to projection problems may suggest ways to improve still further the illumination of the screen. The current carrying capacities of these carbons are given in Table I. Approximately 2 amperes have been allowed as a factor of safety TABLE I. C urrent Ritings of S. R. Minimum A. Positive Carbons Maximum Current Above Carbon Recommended Recommended Which There is Diameter Current Current Lonsrant Sputtering 10 mm. 21 24 25 12 mm. 28 32 14 1 3 mm. 32 42 44 14 mm. 42 52 55 between the maximum current and the extreme upper limit of the carbons. Data on the 10 and 14 mm. carbons have been included although there has up to this time been no active demand by the industry for these sizes. If the carbons are burned above their maximum current, the light will be unsteady and there will be no appreciable gain in candle-power. If the carbons are burned below the minimum current the efficiency of light production is decreased and the arc tends to become unsteady because the crater area is too small to sufficiently cover the end of the carbon. It is the light from the crater of the positive carbon which is of value. The light from the negative carbon and arc stream is only approximately 10 per cent of the total light and cannot be utilized for projection purposes. The diameter of the positive crater increases with increasing current. The data in Table II illustrate the change for these particular carbons. * A resume of recent papers presented before the S.M.I' I ' * National Carbon Company [125]