Cinematographic annual : 1930 (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

136 CINEMATOGRAPHIC ANNUAL hydroquinone. The tests showed a tendency for fog to increase more than in proportion to the additional development produced by the increase of hydroquinone. The net result was that cleaner, more satisfactory development was obtained by increasing the time some twenty percent with metol only as a reducer. The degree of increase of fog with hydroquinone differed somewhat between emulsions, and in many cases was serious. Fig. 4. Eight minute developments with: Sodium sulfite, 75 g/1; metol, varied; borax, 5 g /l ; hydroquinone, varied. Emul. 2568. Curve No. Metol Hydroquinone Fog 1 0 20 .07 2 2.5 0 .07 3 2.5 5 .08 4 2.5 10 .10 Fig. 5. Eight minute developments with : Sodium sulfite, 75 g/1; metol, varied; borax 5 g/1. Emul. 2568. Curve No. Metol PH Foe 1 2.5 9.0 .07 2 5 8.6 .06 3 10 8.2 .07 With metol alone as a reducer, the image density for fixed time of development does not increase indefinitely. Fig. 5 shows a series of curves with increasing metol concentration. It is to be noted that the alkalinity of the developer, pH, decreases due to the addition of the metol, which is sold commercially as a sulfate and hydrolyzes liberating acid in the developer, making the solution less alkaline.