Cinematographic annual : 1930 (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

ARCHITECTURAL, ACOUSTICS 317 lation tests the writer has conducted in a small room in which the percentage articulation increased as the time of reverberation was reduced from 1.0 to .60 seconds. It is now possible, from the upper curve in Fig. U, to derive kr, the reduction factor owing to reverberation, for times of reverberation between .5 and 8.0 seconds. The value of kr is taken as unity for a time of reverberation of .5 second. The value of kr for any other time of reverberation is the ratio of the articulation at that time to the articulation for a time of .5 second. The curve in Fig. 5 gives the value of kr, obtained in 1.0 • d ■ 6 4\ ^ I ix,_ . . — — i i i i i i r 1.0 2.0 3.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 70 8.0 9.0 Rei/erberot /on Seconds FIGURE 5. Curve giving the reverberation reduction factor kr for different times of reverberation. this manner, for different times of reverberation. It will be noted that kr decreases almost uniformly as the time of reverberation increases from 1.0 to 6.0 seconds. Above 6.0 seconds the rate of decrease of kr appears to be less rapid. The deviations of the observed points from the smooth curve in Fig. U can be accounted for by such factors as the shape of the rooms, the variation in reverberation for tones of different pitch, and the distribution of absorptive materials in the rooms. Time will not permit us to enter into a discussion of these factors, although it may be stated that these various factors do not seem to produce a very marked effect upon articulation. In