Cinematographic annual : 1930 (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

442 CINEMATOGRAPHIC ANNUAL the steam table. The press is then closed, and by means of a hydraulic pressure of more than a ton per square inch the record material is pressed into the minute sound grooves of the matrix. Cold water is then turned into the dies, and after a short inter FIGURE 9 Electro-Magnetic Reproducer val the press is opened and the record is separated from the matrix. It is then ready for use. The same operation is repeated as many times as required to provide the desired number of copies. Both in cost and time required the making of these records is very small compared with sound-on-film records. In order to re-create sound from a finished record in the theatre, some form of reproducer must be provided which can first convert the wavy groove on the record into electric currents which will be essentially the same in form as those set up by the microphone on the stage. For this purpose a device similar to a recorder, but equipped with a needle instead of a cutting stylus, would serve. The type of reproducer ordinarily used in the theatre is illustrated in Fig. 9, and though different in physical form, it is the same in principle. The most important difference lies in the provision of a permanent magnet to produce the flux across the armature instead of the electro-magnetic field coil used in the recorder. This results in a very desirable simplification of the theatre equipment.