Cinema (1963)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

KING OF KINGS Critics have an understanding among themselves that Biblical epics are made to enable them to exercise their vitriolic wit. “King of Kings” is no exception and the audience just as consistently has ignored the critic and littered their pockets with torn ticket stubs. The film you can judge for yourself, but there is one area we see fit to dwell upon here: Historical accuracy in decor, technology and costumes has been a fetish of the motion picture maker as well as the audience since the days of Vitagraph’s “Romeo and Juliet.” While not always necessary, a proper historic attitude towards female dress, for instance, can help establish character, set the moral tone of a given period in history, and establish the illusion of reality. While “King of Kings” contains certain inaccuracies, the women’s costumes in particular fulfill their function. 37