Close Up (Jan-Jun 1928)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP Miss Tonge and I tried another effect (which I have not seen done) a short time ago. It is rather like a mix, but instead of fading out, we circled out and circled in, overlapping the two "circles" instead of the fades. I have only just finished the developing of this bit of film and have not had time to run off print yet, so I can't say how it will look on the screen, which is of course, the real test (*). I am very interested in Bryher's remarks on film societies Id suggest that promoters of these schemes take a look -oiector market. A few months ago h motor, spool-boxes and .akers at £45. So far, the .0 renew the brushes of the d be film society has to face seexx_ ectors or films, but finding a home. Rooii^, _ + There one can put up a pri vate theatre, are jolly difficuiL _ id — and the rent and rates are a big liability for a small new unit to undertake. I do feel very strongly that every film society should try to produce one film a year. Xo matter if it is only a few hundred feet, it will make its producers far more intelligently critical than they were before. And such a film should really be produced by the film society. Not by a few members helped out by an ;i imported" professional cameraman. It is not often possible (on the score of expense) for amateurs to under (*) This was ako effectively employed in Siihne. 78