Close Up (Jul-Dec 1928)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP board front is cut out so that each roller will have a separate slit. Then each roller is devoted to some ingredient of the plot. Supposing one roller is given to "Incidents", instead of harmless months or days, it would be filled in with a list of cinematic happenings ; shipwreck, train collision, parachute descent, fire, flood, earthquake, tidal wave, (for such is the 'movie' mind). Another might be given to "Character" coward, thief, drug-taker, sex-maniac, murderer, red-headed momma. And so on thoughout the weary list. The gentleman, whose name features so prominently on the subtitles, takes the plot machine and turns its face to the wall, operates the knobs and trusts that resulting combination will inspire him to contribute to the great cause of bigger and better "mov^ies". If he can construct no box-oflice patchwork from subtly suggestive groupings, such as "coward" and "fire", he tries again. Maybe a gifted psycho-analyst could turn the simple toy into something quite sophisticated, but can you wonder at the childishness of British screen-plays when they are fashioned round such jejune scaffolding ? The delight of the British scenarist knows no bounds when he does it on an idea of his own. In his childlike simplicity he hastens to tell us all about it. We see it in the long shot ; it is emphasized in an extra large close-up ; ringed round with irises, vignettes, and cut-offs. The poor chap is determined that we shall not miss the full import of his masterstroke, and we become so sickened that w^e repeat with the music-hall comedian ; "Even if that was good I wouldn't like it". Whereas 6i