Close Up (Jul-Dec 1928)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP Vol. Ill No. 3 September 1928 AS IS BY THE EDITOR. We have called this a Russian number. We had to, because with a rush of new films from Russia into Germany, there was nothing else to write about. Everything else paled into insignificance. But don't be misled by the term. By Russian number we do not mean that in this issue, and this issue alone we imagine we can give one fraction of the consideration and attention necessary. We can only make a beginning. Russia has imposed — without knowing it — a difficult task on Close Up. For we cannot begin where Russia begins. The ground is not yet ready. Before critical discussions can be made, an impartially critical attitude must be established, and before we can begin to cope with the films as films, we have to cope with the public which has been carefully nurtured to believe that all Russian films are veiled digs at Europe's dwindling thrones, or that — as a London critic (who had probably seen only The Postmaster in the whole course of his career) said — even the Russian films, of which 6