Close Up (Jul-Dec 1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP from Japan, Caballero from Spain, and from Switzerland Guye, Schmitt, Koliler and ]ilasset. Tliere were several difficulties at the beginning. The nature of the independent film (formerh^ avant garde film) was not understood in the same w^ay by dift^erent members of the Congress. Thus, for example, Hans Richter w^as rather perturbed that Pabst had been invited, for, said he, Pabst made " spielfilms that is films with plot and action, wdth professional actors. It was clear that Richter understood that only absolute and abstract films could be denominated independent films. It has often enough been pointed out that the absolute film is definitely a genre of cinema interesting in itself, but at once an error if it is considered as the only possible manifestation of cinema, that is to say as soon as cause and effect are confused. It seems to me negligible and of secondary importance whether a film is made with living or inanimate objects if it has its own integrity. At last a basis was found. And practical discussion became possible. The results of this discussion are the creation of an International League of Independent Cinema and of a co-operative of production. The League will have for its principal aim distribution among the already existing clubs (such as the Film Society or Film Liga) and the creation of films of note. Naturally the films produced by the cooperative will be contained in the programmes of these clubs. The League will also distribute current films w^hich for one reason or another could not be released in the commercial theatres, on the condition, of course, that their cinegraphic value justifies the idea. 307