Close Up (Jul-Dec 1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP Fields believes that it is unique among British or American propaganda films in that there is no villain, and that the ' message ' is not defeated by over emphasis. The ' other side ' is not made a martyr of, and the foolish young man is a very charming personality. The difficulty in making English propaganda films is (a) small allocation of money — the Government allows about a third per reel of the amount allowed in Germany, and (b) the refusal of most public and private societies to allow an interesting story, or a subtle means of approach. The Secrets of Xatiire Films, for which ]\Iiss Fields is responsible, are to be synchronised. It will be possible to listen to the bean as it runs, and the process will be explained by voice instead of by sub-titles. R. d'E. B. The World League for Sexual Reform arranged a showing of the early Russian film Abortion. It is difficult to comment on it from a cinematographic point of view. It was not, as Avas announced, the Russian version but a censored German copy, so scratched that it was sometimes difficult to distinguish the images. The projector and the film broke constantly. It would have seemed worth while to hire a portable projector for the evening. To the intelligent individual it is difficult to understand why the film should not have been shown to family audiences at the Polytechnic. It had much in common with the Little A^ictorian moral stories nurses used to read to children on