Close Up (Jul-Dec 1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP cafes, streets, skyscrapers, newsboys, electric signs, traffic. A politician is assassinated, war is declared, the people are whipped up into a fever of patriotism, panic breaks out on the Stock Exchange. Then, the scenes of war — battlefields — tanks going into action — explosions — men dying in agony, followed by graveyards — the financial chaos — the triumph of the American dollar. The models used (mostly cardboard) were simple but extraordinarily effective, as also were the close-ups and silhouettes of human beings in a number of scenes. Realistic shots of battlefield explosions were achieved by the use of tin reflectors. For the success of a film of this character nearly everything depends on the lighting and the cutting, and both are excellent. Yet the producers worked throughout with only tv;o " Kodalites " ! The cutting based on the Russian method, was very good. Some shots were reduced to a matter of frames. Produced on 16 mmi. stock, Gaiety of Nations sets a standard which every amateur should study closely. Some amateurs seem to aim at imitating the large scale productions of the professional studios. Such methods are almost bound to result in failure, for obvious reasons. The function of amateur cinematography should be to create, and not to imitate, to bring somiething new to the Cinemia, and not to copy old methods. ^lessrs. Ahern and Sewell have shewn what can be done, and hovr it can be done, and the example they have set should result in nothing but good for the amateur film movem.ent in Britain. A. W. Impressed by The Mercury Press Ltd., London, Ileord and Ckelmsford.