Close Up (Jul-Dec 1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP forge : the shaping of bars of metal the manifest content . . . noise the latent content. And how successfully was latent content " condensed " (to use the new Freudian terminology) by the visual mechanism of the " mix " into succeeding shots of cams and tappets higher up on the machine? The noiserhythm was ever present in that sequence. I am in doubt as to whether this noise-rhythm constitutes real " counterpoint Very well, here surely should be sound? But I say not. Why demand a real sound counterpart any more than a real wetness counterpart to a rain-storm scene ? The last thing was, quite fittingly, the exhaust of gases from a tube . . . still pulsing rhythmically . . . the breathing of the machines as they march. Suggestively, the tube was away from the face. ^ * ^ In this film the camera revealed itself through the medium of its limitations. Certain motions were not of suitable rhythm for cinema. In one shot a flying weight governor stood still because its rhythm w^as a simple multiple of sixteen per second. This was observable partially in other shots also. * ^ ¥^ Are we then to conclude that Deslaw has addressed us primarily on a sort of " mind-dynamics "... presenting a series of impressions of mind-motion, inertia, balance, relativity, and what not, far more vital and understandable (to most) than the incomprehensibilities of the practical mathematician? I think so. What a field there is opened for more work of this kind ! L. Saalschutz. 363