Close Up (Jan-Jun 1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP They become montage construction proper when they enter into relations of mutual conflict one with another (this occurs in the examples cited). In this, by the scheme of mutual relations, repeating one another, they proceed to a more and more strongly defined variety of montage, each organically ensuing from the other. Thus the transition from the metrical method to the rhythmic came about as a staging of the conflict between the length of the piece and the intra-cadre movement. The transition to tonal montage as the conflict between the rhythmic and the tonal principle of the piece. And finally, over-tone montage, as the conflict between the tonal principle of the piece (dominant) and the over-tone. These considerations afford us, above all, an interesting criterion for the appreciation of montage-construction from the point of view of its picturesqueness Picturesqueness is contrasted here with " cinematographicality aesthetic picturesqueness with physiological reality. To engage in argument concerning the picturesqueness of the cadre in cinematography is naive. It is typical of people possessing a fair aesthetic culture but absolutely unqualified from the cinematographic standpoint. To this type of reflection belong, for instance, the remarks concerning the cinema made by Casimir Malevich. The merest novice in cinematography would not think of analysing the " kinoi vdre " from the point of view of landscape painting. I think that the following condition should serve as a criterion of the " picturesqueness of the montage-construction in the broadest sense of the term : that the conflict should ^:.e resolved within one or other category of montage, without 263