Close Up (Mar-Dec 1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP 323 with the opera and finishing with the revue and operetta, beating the record of the worst theatrical routine. One must not forget, however, that the silent film, before having attained perfection, started with mobile kitsch-like photographs, and hence Balazs's conviction that in the future the sound film will refine our ear, giving to it as many sensations as the silent film has given to our eye. By an analogy with the culture of the eye, created by the silent film, Balazs sees the development of the sound film on a parallel road, i.e., on a road of creation of the culture of the ear. While our optical sensations had attained their summit, we resented a hunger for additional sensations of the ear. Not so very long ago an orchestra had to perform the sound score in the musical illustrations " strictly corresponding to the picture," i.e., imitating the singing of nightingales or other birds in a scene of love, backing up war scenes by the imitation of shots and the rattle of machine guns. The role of the sound film must not, however, be confined to completing the wants of the silent film. In our postulate with regard to the tone film we claim the creation of a new and individual art. The sonore film has " acoustic prospects," the significance and the importance of which we are not in a position to point out at present. Balazs analysing the "heard world " that surrounds us sets forth certain ideas, which in spite of their invention, are little persuasive. There is no doubt about it that in the development of the tone film a great role will be played by the coloured film and as correctly maintained by Balazs, a film of this kind will have to overcome the co-called montage of colours, i.e., to consider beside the usual montage, the mutual relation of colours, their interference and their optical reaction. The same problem is complicated and becomes more difficult for solution in the threedimensional film, as well as the stereoscopic and plastic ones. The Film in the theatre. The problem of adopting the film on a theatrical stage belongs, according to Balazs, to the problems of montage. The film in the theatre — we understand it as a part " inlaid " in the theatrical show, may be included and submitted to the general mise-en-scene, and this as a strictly independent whole, having onlv these or other contiguous points with the arrangement of a given scene or of a series of scenes. These combinations of the theatre with the film irritate very much the " aesthetisizing " theatrologues who see in this fact a lesion of the " pureness " of theatrical art, forgetting as they do, that the theatre has always been a conglomerate of spiritual elements and of those pertaining to a spectacle; a place of spiritual and also of optical shaping. On the other hand it is wrong to think that by adapting a film to the theatre, will be removed the traditional and conventional contradiction on the stage between the mobile play and the static decor.