Close Up (Mar-Dec 1933)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

120 CLOSE UP this is merely the conclusion of an individual embodiment of that tragedy which' continues to be enacted in the United States even hour and every minute, not in fiction but in fact. It might perhaps be imagined that the formula we selected — the formula of a sociological treatise — would prove dry and didactic, but in fact it enhances the poignancv of the situation and affords a deeper insight into the types and characters of the protagonists. And further it exercises a profound influence on the purely technical methods. It was thanks to this formula, for instance, that the idea of the " internal monologue " was finally evolved in connexion with cinematography. This idea has been engaging" my mind for the last six years. That is to say, I was preoccupied with it before the advent of the sound film made possible its realization in practice. We need, as we have seen above, an extremelv clear and definite exposition of what was happening in Clyde's mind before the actual moment of the accident with the boat, and we saw clearly that this could not be done by a mere presentation of external happenings. Knitted brows, rolling eyes, spasmodic breathing, contorted frame, a stony face, convulsive movements of the hands — all this emotional apparatus was inadequate to express the subtleties of the internal conflict in all its phases. We had to photograph what was going on inside Clyde's mind. We had to demonstrate audiblv and visibly, the feverish torrent of thoughts, interspersed with external action, with the boat, with the girl sitting opposite, with his own actions. The form of the internal monologue was evolved. These montage sheets were wonderful. Even literature is almost powerless in this domain. It has to confine itself to primitive rhetoric, as in Dreiser's description of Clyde's inward broodings, or to the still more blatant mendacity of the pseudo-classic tirades of O'Neill's heroes who, having enlightened the public as to what they are saying, enlighten it in a second monologue, uttered aside, as to what they are thinking. The drama is even more impotent in this matter than orthodox literary prose. The film alone has at its command the means of presenting adequately the hurrying thoughts of an agitated man. Or, if literature can do it too, it can only be literature that transgresses its orthodox bounds. It is brilliantly achieved, as far as is feasible within the harsh framework of literary limitations, in the immortal " inward monologues " of Leopold Bloom, in James Joyce's wonderful " Ulysses."