Close Up (Mar-Dec 1933)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP 201 Our film opens with the arrival of an American liner at Manchester Docks and ends with the imaginary tourist leaving from the Municipal Air Port. The picture has, obviously, got enormous possibilities and is the biggest thing we have tried, but it is going to take some making. P. A. le Neve Foster. TELEVISION By Carleton L. Dyer, (The young Canadian Managing Director of the Philco Radio and Television Corporation of Great Britain.) I feel it my duty to try to calm the palpitations of heart and purse of the cinema fans and members of the motion-picture and radio industries here, caused by the statement in the Daily Press of the usually astute Mr. Samuel Goldwyn, to the effect that television will be available in the homes of most people in 18 months' time, for, from mv considerable experience with the aerial projection of pictures, I would say that five years from now would be an optimistic estimate for the things which Mr. Goldwyn predicts coming into operation. A pronouncement in the entertainment industry from Mr. Goldwyn usually carries a lot of weight, for he has had an enviable record of successes in the cinema industry, but when he spoke to the newspapers he went completely off the famous deep end. It is my experience that when a man makes an optimistic statement, such as that which Mr. Goldwyn has just made to the press, he is getting set to back as a commercial enterprise the subject of his optimism, and, if this is the case with him, I venture to predict that he is getting set to jump off the ladder of success, and the flop with which he will land will re-echo throughout the world. Let me speak for a while of my own experience with television : although my company, Philco, is known throughout the world for making as many radio sets as any other six manufacturers combined, it is a little known fact outside scientific circles that they have spent more money in the development of television than in any other branch of their industry. Just what this financial outlay means can be judged from the fact that whenever they produce a new model of the radio receiver it goes into production immediately, usually in a dozen of their factories, and one of the latest models is now being produced at the rate of 10,000 sets per day. Naturally, therefore, the financial outlay made in research and experiments before launching a new model is considerable. For over a year now we have been satisfied that we can produce a perfect television receiver. The thing which Mr. Goldwyn side-steps is the big problem of who is going to put up the money for the building of television transmitters with money scarce, enormous erection costs to face, the uncertainties about the new aerial channel allotments for television, further engineering developments necessary to ensure that sight can be transmitted without distortion