Communist infiltration of Hollywood motion-picture industry : hearing before the Committee on Un-American activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, first session (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

COMMUNISM IN MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY 67 Mr. Walter. Isn't it true the purpose of those visits was to organize the Communist Party, or help organize the Communist Party, in Los Angeles ? Mr. Jerome. I spoke of the purpose of my visits in 1946 and 1948. I stand by that explanation. Mr. Walter. Did you ever visit Los Angeles for the purpose of aiding in the organization of the Communist Party or a Communist cell in Los Angeles ? Mr. Jerome. I refuse to answer the question, invoking the privilege against self-incrimination. Mr. Kearney. Did I understand you a few minutes ago to say that you wanted to be helpful to this committee ? Mr. Jerome. Yes, sir. Mr. Tavenner. Then will you tell us what you know about Actors' Laboratory in Hollywood ? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privilege against self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Do you know who the founders were of Actors' Laboratory ? Mr. Jerome. I refuse to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege against self-incrimination. Mr. Walter. Perhaps you could refresh his recollection by giving the names. Mr. Tavenner. Do you know J. Edward Bromberg, who was asso- ciated with Actors' Laboratory ? Mr. Jerome. I refuse to answer the question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Were you familiar with the Hollywood Chapter of the Arts, Sciences, and Professions ? Mr. Jerome. No, sir. Mr. Tavenner. Thank you. Mr. Jerome. What does "acquainted" mean ? Mr. Tavenner. Did you know of the organization ? Mr. Jerome. Of its existence? Mr. Tavenner. Of its existence. Mr. Jerome. Yes. That is not my understanding of "acquain- tance." Mr. Tavenner. To what extent were you acquainted with that organization ? Mr. Jerome. I refuse to answer the question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Did you aid or assist in any manner in the forma- tion of that chapter, or counsel or advise others in regard to it ? Mr. Jerome. No, sir. Mr. Tavenner. The Daily Worker of May 11, 1934, identifies you as a member of the National Agit-Prop, which is the expression for the Agitation and Propaganda Commission of the Communist Party. Was that a correct identification? Mr. Jerome. I must decline to answer that question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. Mr. Wood. If it weren't true it wouldn't incriminate you, would it, Mr. Jerome? R1595—51—pt. 1 2