Communist infiltration of Hollywood motion-picture industry : hearing before the Committee on Un-American activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, first session (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

COMMUNISM IN MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY 69 Mr. Jerome. I refuse to answer the question on the grounds of pos- sible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. How long did you remain in Hollywood in 1936 when you went there ? Mr. Jerome. All told I believe I was there about 9 months. Mr. Tavenner. Where did you live during that period of time? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question on the grounds of pos- sible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. During that period of time while you were in Cali- fornia, or immediately prior thereto, was it determined by the national organization of the Communist Party that the Communist funds de- rived from the California area were so large that it was considered advisable to have them sent directly to the national organization in- stead of to the State organization of the Communist Party in Cali- fornia, and wasn't that the practice after your departure? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer that question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. While you were in California during this 9-month period, were you known within Communist Party circles as the the- atrical instructor of the Communist Party for the Hollywood district? Mr. Jerome. I know of no such designation, nor do I lay claim to such title. Mr. Tavenner. You were an instructor of Stalinism and Leninism among the Hollywood group, were you not ? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer that question on the ground of pos- sible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. You state you were not the theatrical instructor, but didn't you engage in work as an instructor in the theory of com- munism while you were in California in 1936 ? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. I would like you to define what you mean by "theatrical instructor." Do you mean theatrical director, or did I cast people into roles? I don't understand the question. Mr. Tavenner. I am asking if you were known by that title ? Mr. Jerome. No. I recollect no such thing. Mr. Tavenner. But if you were an instructor of a theatrical group in Hollywood, that title would be descriptive of your duties in that position, would it not? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Did you engage in such activities while you were there? Mr. Jerome. What activities? Mr. Tavenner. Instructing, lecturing, advising, the Hollywood group on the question of communism. Mr. Jerome. I decline to .answer the question on the grounds of pos- sible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. If you discharged the function I have described, the term "theatrical instructor of the Communist Party" would be an adequate description, would it not? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. The records of this committee reflect that the Holly- wood League Against Naziism was established in California, and that