Communist infiltration of Hollywood motion-picture industry : hearing before the Committee on Un-American activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, first session (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

70 COMMUNISM IN MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY the name was later changed to Hollywood Anti-Nazi League. Do you know the reason for that change ? Mr. Jerome. No, sir. Mr. Tavenner. Were you consulted with respect to the formation of the Hollwood League Against Nazism ? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question on the grounds of possible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. What was the purpose of that organization or the succeeding organization, the Hollywood Anti-Nazi League? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question on the grounds of pos- sible self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Is it not true that efforts to link communism and fascism caused dissension in the Hollywood Anti-Nazi League, as a result of which you were directed to straighten out the trouble? Mr. Jerome. I have no such recollection. Mr. Tavenner. Did you confer with members of the Anti-Nazi League for the purpose of settling the disputes they had within their own organization? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer that question, invoking the privi- lege against self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Were you acquainted with Dr. Inez Decker? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege.. Mr. Tavenner. Do you know whether Dr. Inez Decker was a mem- ber of the Communist Party ? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer, invoking the privilege against self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Did you know James Thorme as a member of the Communist Party? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege against self-incrimination. Mr. Tavenner. Did you know Eva Shaffron as a member of the Communist Party? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege. Mr. Tavenner. Did you know Rudy Lambert as a member of the Communist Party? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege. Mr. Tavenner. Did you know John L. Leech as a member of the Communist Party ? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege. Mr. Tavenner. Were these individuals whose names I have just asked you about members of the executive committee of the Com- munist Party in Los Angeles? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege. Mr. Tavenner. Did you at any time meet with these individuals in the home of Dr. Inez Decker ? Mr. Jerome. I decline to answer the question, invoking the privi- lege.