Communist infiltration of Hollywood motion-picture industry : hearing before the Committee on Un-American activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, first session (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

COMMUNISM IN MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY 413 Mr. Dmytryk. Let me preface that first by saying in the first two points I mentioned, I think the Communists had considerable success in Hollywood. In this last point, they had only limited success. Hollywood is split up into probably two sections, first the talent guilds: Screen Writers' Guild, unaffiliated; Screen Directors' Guild, unaffiliated; and Screen Actors' Guild, which is affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, but is largely autonomous. Then there are the craft unions, mostly IATSE. I think that is In- ternational Association of Theatrical and Stage Employees. I know that the Communists were successful for a time in taking over or largely controlling—they didn't take over but controlled for a long time—the Screen Writers' Guild. They got a number of men on the board to pass their resolutions and that sort of thing. They were not successful at all in the Screen Directors' Guild. There were only a very few Communists in the Screen Directors' Guild at any time. Mr. Tavexxer. Were you in the Screen Directors' Guild ? Mr. Dmytryk. Yes, from 1939 on. Mr. Tavexxer. How many were there in the Screen Directors' Guild? Mr. Dmytryk. I only knew of seven. I recall a special meeting at which they were present. Mr. Wood. I don't believe he understood your question. Mr. Tavexner. No. I meant the total membership of the Screen Directors' Guild at that time. Mr. Dmytryk. The total membership, full directors, was 225 or 2-30. Mr. Tavexxer. And of that number there were seven known to you to be members of the Communist Party ? Mr. Dmytryk. As far as I know there were seven, and as far as I know that was just about all. Mr. Tavexxer. Will you give us the names of the seven \ Mr. Dmytryk. Yes. Frank Tuttle. Mr. Tavexxer. He was a director ? Mr. Dmytryk. Yes. Mr. Tavexxer. T-u-t-t-1-e? Mr. Dmytryk. T-u-t-t-1-e. Herbert Biberman, B-i-b-e-r-m-a-n, I believe. Jack Berry. I don't know whether he spells it B-e-r-r-y or B-a-r-r-y. Mr. Tavexxer. Can you identify him further? Mr. Dmytryk. I heard the chairman this morning give the address. He is the Berry who lives on Kings Road. The meeting was at his house. That is why I know. Bernard Vorhaus. Mr. Tavenxer. Will you spell that ? Mr. Dmytryk. I believe it is V-o-r-h-a-u-s. Mr. Tavexxer. I believe you have named four. Mr. Dmytryk. Then Jules Dassin, D-a-s-s-i-n. And myself. Mr. Tavexxer. Do you have any definite knowledge of any of the others having left the Communist Party ? Mr. Dmytryk. No ; I don't. I think it is quite possible that some of them have, because that has happened to a large extent in Holly- wood in the last few years.