Communist infiltration of Hollywood motion-picture industry : hearing before the Committee on Un-American activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, first session (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

COMMUNISM IN MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY 1787 Mr. Tavenner. Meaning, of course, that it has met with your gen- eral approval as being a product which was worthy of acquiring? Mr. Gordon. Worthy of further consideration. Mr. Tavenner. How long have you been engaged in the work of an editor? Mr. Gordon. Well, I have been in my present position for a little over 3 years. Is that what you meant ? Mr. Tavenner. Yes, sir. ' Prior to that time what was your par- ticular work? Mr. Gordon. I was head of the reading department at Paramount for G years. Mr. Tavenner. Will you describe briefly what the duties of a reader are. Mr. Gordon. Of a reader? Mr. Tavenner. Yes. Mr. Gordon. The primary work of a reader is to read literary and dramatic material and to synopsize it and to comment upon it. This is the first stage in a consideration of literary material. Mr. Tavenner. For how long a period of time did you engage in the work of a reader ? Mr. Gordon. Well, I don't know how to put it because I have been a reader at various times and assistant at various times, head of read- ing, and back and forth. I have been engaged in this work for ap- proximately 25 years. Mr. Tavenner. Mr. Gordon, a witness, Mr. Martin Berkeley, who appeared before this committee, identified you as a member of the Communist Party and in so doing stated: I met with him with the Screen Writers' Guild. I attended a meeting of the Screen Writers' Guild at which I met Don Gordon and subsequently later met him at the meetings of the writers' fraction. Was that testimony by Mr. Berkeley true or was it false? Mr. Gordon. Well, I have never been a member of the Screen Writers' Guild, except possibly at one point when the Screen Readers' Guild was in a sense affiliated with it. As to this testimony, or any response to your question, I claim the privilege under the fifth amend- ment which states that a witness may not be required to testify against himself. Mr. Tavenner. When was it that the Readers' Guild was affiliated with the Screen Writers' Guild? Mr. Gordon. It w T as a long time ago, but I think it was somewhere in 1933 that that affiliation began and it terminated somewhere in the next 2 or 3 years. Mr. Tavenner. Where did you reside in 1932; did you tell us that ? Mr. Gordon. 1932? Mr. Tavenner. Yes, sir. Mr. Gordon. I have lived in the same house for about 18 years. I'm not sure of the exact date. It w T as either 1932 or 1933 that I moved into it. Mr. Tavenner. What is your present address ? Mr. Gordon. 6853 Pacific View Drive, Los Angeles, Calif. Mr. Tavenner. Prior to that time what was the place of your resi- dence ? Mr. Gordon. Well, for about a year or so I lived on a street called, I think it was, Cumberland, but I don't remember the address.