Communist infiltration of Hollywood motion-picture industry : hearing before the Committee on Un-American activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, first session (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

2360 COMMUNISM IN HOLLYWOOD MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY Mr. Walter. Did you advocate the abolition of this committee at that time ? Mr. Blankfort. I advocated a change in procedure. That was my chief criticism. Mr. Walter. Was that because you were fearful that the committee would continue its investigation of Hollywood? Mr. Blankfort. No ; I don't think I was fearful that the committee would continue its investigation. I was fearful that the investigation would not be fair, let us say, or reasonable. Mr. Tavenner. Attached to the letter which I handed you is an article, a photostatic copy of an article appearing in the Daily Worker of December 29, 1948, which says: A group of distinguished writers, clergymen, actors, and other notables, called upon the Eighty-first Congress to abolish the Un-American Activities Committee. The request was made in a statement released by the National Council of the Arts, Sciences, and Professions. Signers of the statement included— and giving the list of names, a person by the name of Michael Blankfort. Mr. Blankfort. Doesn't that come from the same list ? Mr. Tavenner. Yes; the same list refers to the same incident. Mr. Blankfort. Yes. Mr. Tavenner. But I want you to look at the article from the Daily Worker and state whether or not you saw that article. Mr. Blankfort. I can answer that without looking at it. I never saw the article. I have never seen the Daily Worker. Mr. Tavenner. Then, as far as the use of your name in that par- ticular article is concerned, or the article referred to, it was done without your permission? Mr. Blankfort. To the best of my knowledge, yes. Mr. Walter. Have you ever seen the article before ? Mr. Blankfort. No, sir. Mr. Walter. What do you propose to do now that your name has been used without authority to find out why people had the temerity to use your name without permission? Mr. Blankfort. I don't think these organizations are still in exist- ence. If they were I would write them a letter and tell them, and express my view on this. Mr. Jackson. You can write the Hollywood Chapter of the Arts, Sciences, and Professions. It is still in existence. Mr. Blankfort. I have. Mr. Tavenner. They are still in existence. Mr. Blankfort. I have. I cannot tell you the date, but I perhaps could find out when I did and resigned from my membership. Has that committee ever been classed subversive? Mr. Tavenner. Yes, it has been. The National Council of the Arts, Sciences, and Professions was cited as a Communist front by the Committee on Un-American Activities on April 26, 1950. The Holly- wood chapter is an affiliate of that national organization. Mr. Blankfort. You understand, Mr. Tavenner, I did not say I had not been a member. Mr. Tavenner. I understand that. Mr. Blankfort. I don't want that to—I think you understand better than I do that when you are a member of an organization, I never