We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
3524 COMMUNISM IN HOLLYWOOD MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY married in August 1946, but before I got married I had a long talk with my fiancee about it, and agreed, because I wanted to, that I would never again consider myself a Communist, go to a Communist meeting, or engage in any activities which I knew were Communist led, and I never have. Mr. Wood. When did your contributions to the party cease ? Miss Lennart. My contributions stopped when I stopped going to meetings, which was in 1945. Mr. Velde. Did you do anything else of a positive nature to dis- associate yourself from the party, like writing a letter ? Miss Lennart. No ; I was called and asked if I was coming to any more meetings, and this is the name—I had forgotten this call, inci- dentally, I was called by a man named—I have never met him or seen Mm. It was Stach or Stapp, I don't know which his name is. Mr. Tavenner. John Stapp ? Miss Lennart. That, I am almost sure, is the name. He telephoned to ask if I would plan to come to any more meetings, and I said "No." Mr. Tavenner. Did you learn that he was the functionary of the Communist Party in Los Angeles ? Miss Lennart. I had heard his name as being—no, I can't say in Los Angeles, but I heard he was a functionary of the Communist Party. Mr. Tavenner. Did he ask you for any reasons why you had stopped attending the party meetings ? Miss Lennart. No ; but I think these reasons were well known in my group. It is not a policy in the party, especially for a woman, if it is a woman who has been a Communist, if she makes a marriage, mixed marriage to somebody who is not a Communist, it is generally ac- cepted—it isn't a rule or anything—but I suppose for security reasons it is just expected that you probably will want to leave, and I think this is why I got no pressure except for this question. I think that my increasing resistance at meetings and the decreasing number of meetings I went to must have made this quite clear before I actually stopped completely. Mr. Tavenner. What was your activity in the Screen Writers' Guild, after you withdrew from the Communist Party in 1945 ? Miss Lennart. My period of activity in the guild, of any real ac- tivity in the guild, was after—I must say 1946, is the date I would give as the formal end. I had no activity in 1945, but 1946 was when I really considered that the break was final. I was more active in the guild after I was out of the Communist Party than I had ever been before. I think this was largely because I began to be a little more established in my profession. I was for a year alternate on the board of directors of the guild. I was for a year on the editorial board of the guild magazine Screen Writer, and I was elected not by the guild but the writers of my studio as shop steward there for a year. That is normally pretty much a bookkeeping job. You keep track of as- signments, credits, and so on. But during the year I was shop steward there was a very confusing jurisdictional strike. At the guild request I called a meeting of writers on the lot to decide whether we would go through the picket lines or not. We did go through the picket lines which was the guild decision, I believe, at the time.