Communist infiltration of Hollywood motion-picture industry : hearing before the Committee on Un-American activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, first session (1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

4484 COMMUNISM IN HOLLYWOOD MOTION-PICTURE INDUSTRY I hadn't known that, it wasn't in the paper. He said, "What are yon going to do with it?" I said, "Well, I think I have to keep that to myself." He said, "Well, I think the only thing to do is to stick with the fifth amendment." I said, "Sam, it is something I don't agree with you on, but I can't argue with you." It got very cold in the restaurant and I got up, and as a matter of fact we ordered coffee and I didn't finish the coffee, I paid the bill and went to my rehearsal and he left, and I haven't seen him since. Mr. Tavenner. Did he take the initiative of getting in touch with you at that time ? Mr. Burrows. Yes, sir. He called me. I hadn't seen him in a long time. Mr. Wood. Do you know what the provision of the fifth amend- ment is ? Mr. Burrows. I believe it is refusing to testify, it is a refusal to testify on the ground that what you say might incriminate you. Mr. Wood. You knew that then, did you not ? Mr. Burrows. Yes, sir. Mr. Wood. Why would he ask you to avail yourself of the protection of the fifth amendment, in appearing before this committee ? Mr. Burrows. His theory was that everybody ought to stick together. Mr. Wood. Everybody ? Mr. Burrows. Everybody. Mr. Wood. You mean the pastor of the First Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles ought to hide behind the fifth amendment ? Mr. Burrows. Well, Mr. Wood, if I may point out, back in the days when the first group of people from Hollywood were called, I remember reading a thing about them, in which one of them said—whether it was a public statement or what, I forget what—in which they said that everybody, regardless of whether they had been members of the Com- munist Party or whether they had never been members, were to stick together in bucking the committee. Mr. Wood. And do you know there were 12 of them that came here and did that? Mr. Burrows. What is that ? Mr. Wood. Did you know 12 of them came from Hollywood before this committee and claimed the protection of the fifth amendment? Mr. Burrows. I didn't know how many had done it, sir. Mr. Wood. Did you know that every one of them have been iden- tified in sworn testimony before this committee that they were mem- bers, and a lot of them have come before the committee voluntarily since they served their sentence in jail and admitted their membership? Mr. Burrows. Yes, sir; I know that. Mr. Wood. Why would this party be asking you or suggesting to you that you also avail yourself of the protection of the fifth amend- ment ? Mr. Burrows. Because I think the Communists—I don't know i f everybody who was subpenaed back in, for instance 1948, whenever that was, was a Communist or not. But I know the Communists in their requests said they thought everybody should refuse to talk to the committee. Mr. Wood. Every Communist?